Two-country study of engagement, supervisors and performance appraisal
- 7 August 2017
- journal article
- Published by Emerald in Journal of Asia Business Studies
- Vol. 11 (3), 342-362
- https://doi.org/10.1108/jabs-07-2015-0105
Abstract
Purpose Multinational enterprises are increasingly interested in improving employee engagement across diverse geographies, signifying the importance of understanding antecedents of engagement across different national business systems. This study aims to explore the relationship between an important job resource, perceived performance appraisal fairness and employee engagement in two countries: the UK and India. Critically, the mediating role of perceived supervisor support in these contrasting cultural contexts is investigated, as well as differentiating between two types of engagement: work and organization. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on a UK-based multinational enterprise operating in its home country and in India, survey data from 249 employees are analyzed. Findings The survey results indicate that there are positive relationships between elements of perceived performance appraisal fairness and engagement in both countries, and that supervisor support plays an important mediating role. There are, however, important differences between the two countries’ results. Research limitations/implications Cross-sectional data from a single firm are a limitation of this study, as well as using national culture as an explanatory variable although this is not measured. Future research should attempt to measure culture, especially in India, where cultural heterogeneity is high. Practical implications The study demonstrates the importance of ensuring appropriate mechanisms in different overseas operations to achieve engagement when implementing performance appraisal. Originality/value This study expands significantly our knowledge surrounding the engagement construct by including both work and organization engagement, measured simultaneously in two contrasting national contexts. Furthermore, it highlights the value of national business systems cultural theorizing to explain differences in employee workplace experiences.Keywords
This publication has 75 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validation of the Job Demands-Resources model in cross-national samples: Cross-sectional and longitudinal predictions of psychological strain and work engagementHuman Relations, 2013
- The relative importance of organizational justice dimensions on employee outcomes: a critical reanalysis using relative weights analysisOrganization Management Journal, 2011
- Psychological Contracts across CulturesOrganization Studies, 2010
- Towards a model of work engagementCareer Development International, 2008
- Manager Trustworthiness or Interactional Justice? Predicting Organizational Citizenship BehaviorsJournal of Business Ethics, 2007
- The Measurement of Work Engagement With a Short QuestionnaireEducational and Psychological Measurement, 2006
- Performance appraisal and culture: practice and attitudes in Hong Kong and Great BritainThe International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1998
- Antecedents of organizational commitment across occupational groups: A meta‐analysisJournal of Organizational Behavior, 1992
- Measuring Perceived Supervisory and Organizational SupportEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1988
- Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job RedesignAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1979