Pilot study of the roles of personality, references, and personal statements in relation to performance over the five years of a medical degree * Commentary: How to derive causes from correlations in educational studies
Open Access
- 22 February 2003
- Vol. 326 (7386), 429-432
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7386.429
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the power of three traditional selection procedures (A levels, personal statements, and references) and one non-traditional selection procedure (personality) to predict performance over the five years of a medical degree. Design: Cohort study over five years. Setting: Nottingham medical school. Participants: Entrants in 1995. Main outcome measures: A level grades, amounts of information contained in teacher's reference and the student's personal statement, and personality scores examined in relation to 18 different assessments. Results: Information in the teacher's reference did not consistently predict performance. Information in the personal statement was predictive of clinical aspects of training, whereas A level grades primarily predicted preclinical performance. The personality domain of conscientiousness was consistently the best predictor across the course. A structural model indicated that conscientiousness was positively related to A level grades and preclinical performance but was negatively related to clinical grades. Conclusion: A teacher's reference is of no practical use in predicting clinical performance of medical students, in contrast to the amount of information contained in the personal statement. Therefore, simple quantification of the personal statement should aid selection. Personality factors, in particular conscientiousness, need to be considered and integrated into selection procedures. Objectives: To compare the power of three traditional selection procedures (A levels, personal statements, and references) and one non-traditional selection procedure (personality) to predict performance over the five years of a medical degree. Design: Cohort study over five years. Setting: Nottingham medical school. Participants: Entrants in 1995. Main outcome measures: A level grades, amounts of information contained in teacher's reference and the student's personal statement, and personality scores examined in relation to 18 different assessments. Results: Information in the teacher's reference did not consistently predict performance. Information in the personal statement was predictive of clinical aspects of training, whereas A level grades primarily predicted preclinical performance. The personality domain of conscientiousness was consistently the best predictor across the course. A structural model indicated that conscientiousness was positively related to A level grades and preclinical performance but was negatively related to clinical grades. Conclusion: A teacher's reference is of no practical use in predicting clinical performance of medical students, in contrast to the amount of information contained in the personal statement. Therefore, simple quantification of the personal statement should aid selection. Personality factors, in particular conscientiousness, need to be considered and integrated into selection procedures.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Medical students' personality characteristics and academic performance: a five-factor model perspectiveMedical Education, 2002
- Factors associated with success in medical school: systematic review of the literatureBMJ, 2002
- Intercalated degrees, learning styles, and career preferences: prospective longitudinal study of UK medical studentsBMJ, 1999
- Relationship between quantity of undergraduate science preparation and preclinical performance in medical schoolAcademic Medicine, 1995
- Using Standardized Patients to Improve Medical Studentsʼ Interpersonal Skills at the Beginning of Their Third YearJournal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 1991
- Short-listing of applicants from UCCA forms: the structure of pre-selection judgementsMedical Education, 1989
- Admission for medicine in the United Kingdom: a structural model of background factorsMedical Education, 1986