The effects of fructo-oligosaccharides in combination with soy protein on bone in osteopenic ovariectomized rats
- 1 July 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Menopause
- Vol. 13 (4), 692-699
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gme.0000195372.74944.71
Abstract
Objective: The intestinal microflora is important in rendering soy isoflavones bioavailable by facilitating their conversion to equol. Hence, substances that can modulate the intestinal microflora could affect the bioavailability of isoflavones. In this study, we examined the effects of fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS), a prebiotic, on enhancing the effects of soy isoflavones on bone in ovariectomized osteopenic female rats. Design: Sixty-three 9-month-old female Sprague-Dawley rats were either sham-operated (Sham; one group) or ovariectomized (Ovx; four groups) and were fed a control diet for 3 months to induce bone loss. After bone loss was confirmed via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, rats were placed on dietary treatment for 4 months. The Sham and one Ovx group received a control diet, and the remaining Ovx groups received either a soy protein-based diet (Soy), a FOS-supplemented diet (FOS), or a soy protein-based and FOS-supplemented diet (Soy+FOS). Before the termination of the study, whole-body bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) were assessed under anesthesia. Immediately after euthanasia, bone specimens were collected for the assessments of BMD, BMC, and biomechanical and microarchitectural properties. Results: Whole-body BMD values were significantly higher in FOS and Soy+FOS groups compared with Ovx controls. The tibial BMC increased by 10%, 6%, and 4% in Soy, FOS, and Soy+FOS groups, respectively, compared to the Ovx control group. FOS and FOS+Soy treatments had the most pronounced effects in enhancing lumbar BMC and BMD. The FOS+Soy combination effectively improved tibial microarchitectural properties by enhancing trabecular number and lowering trabecular separation compared with Ovx controls. The effects of dietary treatments on lumbar microarchitectural properties were minimal and biomechanical properties of the femur were not affected by any of the dietary treatments. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that, although incorporation of either soy or FOS in the diet of Ovx rats can improve BMD of the whole body, tibiae, and lumbar vertebrae, their combination had no any additive effects. However, in terms of microarchitecture, the combination of soy and FOS had a greater effect in reversing the loss of certain microarchitectural parameters such as tibial trabecular number, separation, and thickness.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- One year soy protein supplementation has positive effects on bone formation markers but not bone density in postmenopausal womenNutrition Journal, 2005
- Modulation of the Human Gut Microflora Towards Improved Health Using Prebiotics - Assessment of EfficacyCurrent Pharmaceutical Design, 2005
- Early discontinuation of treatment for osteoporosisAmerican Journal Of Medicine, 2003
- Dose-dependent bone-sparing effects of dietary isoflavones in the ovariectomised rat.British Journal of Nutrition, 2001
- Isoflavone-rich soy protein isolate attenuates bone loss in the lumbar spine of perimenopausal womenThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2000
- Role of soy protein with normal or reduced isoflavone content in reversing bone loss induced by ovarian hormone deficiency in ratsThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1998
- Bone-sparing effect of soy protein in ovarian hormone–deficient rats is related to its isoflavone contentThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1998
- Soy protein and isoflavones: their effects on blood lipids and bone density in postmenopausal womenThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1998
- Dietary Soybean Protein Prevents Bone Loss in an Ovariectomized Rat Model of OsteoporosisJournal of Nutrition, 1996
- Bioavailability of Soybean Isoflavones Depends upon Gut Microflora in WomenJournal of Nutrition, 1995