Commentary on: Double-Blind Comparison of Ultrasonic and Conventional Osteotomy in Terms of Early Postoperative Edema and Ecchymosis
- 9 March 2016
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Aesthetic Surgery Journal
- Vol. 36 (4), 402-403
- https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw016
Abstract
It should be noted that the rhinoplasties in the Ilhan et al study were performed using a dental device that is not approved for use in the operating room (the VarioSurg3 piezosurgery unit, Nakanishi Inc., Kanuma, Tochigi, Japan) as well as maxillofacial inserts that are not designed for rhinoplasty. Moreover, the operations were not performed exclusively with piezoelectric instruments – hump removal was done with a Rubin osteotome and bone rasping was done with a mechanical rasp. The authors state that uncontrolled or comminuted fractures can result from conventional osteotomies and that using conventional instruments for this procedure is more likely to result in bleeding, bruising, and edema. However, in …Keywords
This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Double-Blind Comparison of Ultrasonic and Conventional Osteotomy in Terms of Early Postoperative Edema and EcchymosisAesthetic Surgery Journal, 2016
- The Role of Piezoelectric Instrumentation in Rhinoplasty SurgeryAesthetic Surgery Journal, 2015