Extent and limits of cooperation in animals
- 20 June 2011
- journal article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
- Vol. 108 (supplement), 10902-10909
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100291108
Abstract
Individuals in many animal species are strongly motivated to form close social bonds and to attend to the social interactions of others. Some animals may also recognize other individuals' intentions and simple mental states. Such curiosity appears to be adaptive, because it enables observers to learn about others' status and relationships and to anticipate future events without direct participation. However, many questions remain unresolved. In particular, it remains unclear whether animals keep track of favors given and received when interacting with others, and whether they rely on memory of past cooperative acts when anticipating future ones. Primates appear to possess many of the cognitive abilities required for human-like contingent cooperation. However, most investigations of captive primates have indicated that cooperation is seldom contingency-based, and that interactions are not influenced by inequity aversion or sensitivity to cheaters. In contrast, several experiments with nonprimates have found that animals can take into account recent interactions when supporting others, suggesting that the apparent rarity of contingent cooperation in primates may not stem from cognitive constraints. Instead, individuals may tolerate short-term inequities in favors given and received because most cooperation occurs among long-term reciprocating partners.Keywords
This publication has 92 references indexed in Scilit:
- Encephalization is not a universal macroevolutionary phenomenon in mammals but is associated with socialityProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010
- Female chacma baboons form strong, equitable, and enduring social bondsBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2010
- Contingent cooperation between wild female baboonsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010
- Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) rapidly learn to select dominant individuals in videos of artificial social interactions between unfamiliar conspecifics.Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2010
- Varieties of altruism in children and chimpanzeesTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 2009
- Supply and demand determine the market value of food providers in wild vervet monkeysProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009
- Tests of planning and the Bischof-Köhler hypothesis in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)Behavioural Processes, 2009
- Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) do not develop contingent reciprocity in an experimental taskAnimal Cognition, 2009
- Chimpanzees modify recruitment screams as a function of audience compositionProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007
- Chimpanzees are vengeful but not spitefulProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007