Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 January 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Vol. 20 (1), 144-151
- https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000681
Abstract
Objective To review the methods and dimensions of data quality assessment in the context of electronic health record (EHR) data reuse for research. Materials and methods A review of the clinical research literature discussing data quality assessment methodology for EHR data was performed. Using an iterative process, the aspects of data quality being measured were abstracted and categorized, as well as the methods of assessment used. Results Five dimensions of data quality were identified, which are completeness, correctness, concordance, plausibility, and currency, and seven broad categories of data quality assessment methods: comparison with gold standards, data element agreement, data source agreement, distribution comparison, validity checks, log review, and element presence. Discussion Examination of the methods by which clinical researchers have investigated the quality and suitability of EHR data for research shows that there are fundamental features of data quality, which may be difficult to measure, as well as proxy dimensions. Researchers interested in the reuse of EHR data for clinical research are recommended to consider the adoption of a consistent taxonomy of EHR data quality, to remain aware of the task-dependence of data quality, to integrate work on data quality assessment from other fields, and to adopt systematic, empirically driven, statistically based methods of data quality assessment. Conclusion There is currently little consistency or potential generalizability in the methods used to assess EHR data quality. If the reuse of EHR data for clinical research is to become accepted, researchers should adopt validated, systematic methods of EHR data quality assessment.Keywords
This publication has 114 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validation of diabetes mellitus and hypertension diagnosis in computerized medical records in primary health careBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2011
- Temporal and within practice variability in the health improvement networkPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2011
- Electronic Medical Records Are Not Associated With Improved Documentation in Community Primary Care PracticesAmerican Journal of Medical Quality, 2011
- A method of identifying and correcting miscoding, misclassification and misdiagnosis in diabetes: a pilot and validation study of routinely collected dataDiabetic Medicine, 2010
- Using your electronic medical record for research: a primer for avoiding pitfallsFamily Practice, 2009
- Validity of The Health Improvement Network (THIN) for epidemiologic studies of hepatitis C virus infectionPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2009
- Measuring quality of care for rheumatic diseases using an electronic medical recordAnnals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 2008
- Measuring Performance Directly Using the Veterans Health Administration Electronic Medical RecordMedical Care, 2007
- A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation DataAmerican Journal of Evaluation, 2006
- Validation of information recorded on general practitioner based computerised data resource in the United Kingdom.BMJ, 1991