Rurality and Collective Attitude Effects on Wolf Policy
Open Access
- 26 July 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 8 (8), 711
- https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080711
Abstract
Debates over wolf policy are driven by an underlying attitudinal divide between people from urban and rural areas. This study explores how the power relationship between urban and rural groups interact with individual attitude formation in relation to wolf policy, in order to understand why dissatisfaction with wolf policy tends to result in group level conflict patterns. Using Swedish survey data, I analyze attitudes to wolf policy, in relation to collective level effects and rural political alienation. Findings indicate that individual level attitudes towards the Swedish wolf policy are in part determined by collective attitude patterns: effects that could be contingent on political alienation. This highlights the possibility of reducing attitude polarization with respect to the wolf policy, by addressing political alienation among the rural population.Funding Information
- FORMAS (NA)
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relative DeprivationPersonality and Social Psychology Review, 2011
- Complexities of conflict: the importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human–wildlife conflictAnimal Conservation, 2010
- The good bad wolf—wolf evaluation reveals the roots of the Finnish wolf conflictEuropean Journal of Wildlife Research, 2010
- Coefficients of Determination in Logistic Regression Models—A New Proposal: The Coefficient of DiscriminationThe American Statistician, 2009
- Relative Deprivation and Intergroup PrejudiceJournal of Social Issues, 2008
- Cry Wolf!: Narratives of Wolf Recovery in France and Norway*Rural Sociology, 2008
- The problem of spatial scale when studying the human dimensions of a natural resource conflict: humans and wolves in SwedenInternational Journal of Biodiversity Science & Management, 2006
- Attitudes of hunters, locals, and the general public in Sweden now that the wolves are backBiological Conservation, 2003
- Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis.American Psychologist, 2001
- A model of egoistical relative deprivation.Psychological Review, 1976