Implants in partially edentulous patients. A longitudinal study of bridges supported by both implants and natural teeth.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the outcome of bridges supported by implants with bridges supported by a combination of implants and natural teeth abutments. The study comprised 23 patients with Applegate Kennedy Class I dentition in the mandible and a full upper denture. Implants ad modum Brånemark were inserted in the posterior areas of both mandibular quadrants. On one side, a bridge supported by 2 implants was constructed (Type I) and on the other side, a bridge supported by 1 tooth (mostly the canine or first premolar) and 1 implant was made (Type II). A total of 46 bridges were made and during the 3‐year follow‐up period, 4 Type I and 2 Type II bridges were lost. 8 out of 69 implants were lost during the 3‐year follow‐up, resulting in an implant survival rate of 88.4%. Marginal bone loss, one of several parameters, was evaluated on standardized intraoral radiographs. This was performed during the 1st and 2nd year of function and the total mean bone loss from loading was 0.46 mm and 0.56 mm, respectively. The bone loss during the 2nd year of function was significantly less, adjacent to implants supporting Type II bridges, than adjacent to implants supporting Type I bridges. Summarily, no disadvantages of combining of teeth and implants in the same bridge were found in this study. On the contrary, the slightly lower marginal bone loss adjacent to implants in Type II bridges may indicate that the bone reactions could be more favorable when bridges 1 are connected to both implants and teeth.