A Simple Method for Differentiating Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion/Empyema from Parapneumonic Effusion Using the Split Pleura Sign and the Amount of Pleural Effusion on Thoracic CT
Open Access
- 15 June 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 10 (6), e0130141
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130141
Abstract
Pleural separation, the “split pleura” sign, has been reported in patients with empyema. However, the diagnostic yield of the split pleura sign for complicated parapneumonic effusion (CPPE)/empyema and its utility for differentiating CPPE/empyema from parapneumonic effusion (PPE) remains unclear. This differentiation is important because CPPE/empyema patients need thoracic drainage. In this regard, the aim of this study was to develop a simple method to distinguish CPPE/empyema from PPE using computed tomography (CT) focusing on the split pleura sign, fluid attenuation values (HU: Hounsfield units), and amount of fluid collection measured on thoracic CT prior to diagnostic thoracentesis. A total of 83 consecutive patients who underwent chest CT and were diagnosed with CPPE (n=18)/empyema (n=18) or PPE (n=47) based on the diagnostic thoracentesis were retrospectively analyzed. On univariate analysis, the split pleura sign (odds ratio (OR), 12.1; ppp=0.001), and the presence of septum (OR, 6.43; p=0.018), atelectasis (OR, 6.83; p=0.002), or air (OR, 9.90; p=0.002) in pleural fluid were significantly higher in the CPPE/empyema group than in the PPE group. On multivariate analysis, only the split pleura sign (hazard ratio (HR), 6.70; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.91-23.5; p=0.003) and total amount of pleural effusion (≥30 mm) on thoracic CT (HR, 7.48; 95%CI, 1.76-31.8; p=0.006) were risk factors for empyema. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the presence of both split pleura sign and total amount of pleural effusion (≥30 mm) on thoracic CT for CPPE/empyema were 79.4%, 80.9%, 75%, and 84.4%, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.801 on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. This study showed a high diagnostic yield of the split pleura sign and total amount of pleural fluid (≥30 mm) on thoracic CT that is useful and simple for discriminating between CPPE/empyema and PPE prior to diagnostic thoracentesis.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interleukin-18 is up-regulated in infectious pleural effusionsCytokine, 2013
- Signs in chest imaging: a pictorial reviewDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, 2009
- CT appearances of talc pleurodesisClinical Radiology, 2007
- U.K. Controlled Trial of Intrapleural Streptokinase for Pleural InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Pleural EffusionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Predictors of Outcome and Long-term Survival in Patients with Pleural InfectionAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1999
- The clinical course and management of thoracic empyemaQJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Empyema of the Thorax in AdultsChest, 1993
- Empyema thoracis: 14-year experience in a teaching centerThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1991
- Differentiating lung abscess and empyema: radiography and computed tomographyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1983