Development and Implementation of Conflict-Based Assessment of Pedestrian Safety to Evaluate Accessibility of Complex Intersections
- 1 January 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
- Vol. 2264 (1), 148-155
- https://doi.org/10.3141/2264-17
Abstract
This paper describes the development and implementation of the conflict-based assessment of pedestrian safety (CAPS) methodology for the evaluation of pedestrian accessibility at complex intersections. Significant research has explored pedestrian access to modern roundabouts and other complex intersections, and a significant focus has been placed on accessibility for pedestrians who were blind. A majority of these studies relied on actual street crossings by study participants under the supervision of a trained orientation and mobility specialist. These crossing studies quantified risk from a measurement of intervention events, in which the orientation and mobility specialist had to physically stop the participant from crossing. Although such studies provide useful data on the crossing risk at a particular intersection, street crossings can be dangerous to the study participants and are time-consuming and expensive to conduct. The CAPS method emphasizes the use of conflict-based safety factors to quantify risk in a framework compatible with indicator studies. This method relates pedestrian crossing decisions to advanced measurements of vehicle dynamics to estimate lane-by-lane conflicts and identifies the grade of conflict on the basis of a five-criterion rating scale. The CAPS framework was applied to a study of crossings by blind pedestrians at a multilane roundabout. The resulting risk scores were calibrated from the actual orientation and mobility interventions observed during the study. The calibrated CAPS framework correctly matched all (high-risk) orientation and mobility intervention events and further identified other (lower-risk) pedestrian–vehicle conflicts. The CAPS framework provides a more efficient, objective, and consistent safety assessment of pedestrian crossings in a research context, without the need for pedestrians to step into the roadway.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Development and Implementation of a Vehicle–Pedestrian Conflict Analysis MethodTransportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010
- Working Concept of AccessibilityTransportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2009
- Exploratory Analysis of Crossing Difficulties for Blind and Sighted Pedestrians at Channelized Turn LanesTransportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2006
- Street Crossing by Sighted and Blind Pedestrians at a Modern RoundaboutJournal of Transportation Engineering, 2005
- Blind and Sighted Pedestrians' Judgments of Gaps in Traffic at RoundaboutsHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2005