Boundary Dam or Petra Nova – Which is a better model for CCS energy supply?
- 11 January 2019
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by Elsevier BV in International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
- Vol. 82, 59-68
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.01.004
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- An assessment of CCS costs, barriers and potentialEnergy Strategy Reviews, 2018
- Derate Mitigation Options for Pulverized Coal Power Plant Carbon Capture RetrofitsEnergy Procedia, 2017
- Financing CCS Demonstration Projects: Lessons Learned from Two Decades of ExperienceEnergy Procedia, 2017
- On the retrofitting and repowering of coal power plants with post-combustion carbon capture: An advanced integration option with a gas turbine windboxInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2017
- Opportunities for Decarbonizing Existing U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants via CO2 Capture, Utilization and StorageEnvironmental Science & Technology, 2015
- Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science BasisPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2014
- Start-up of World's First Commercial Post-combustion Coal Fired CCS Project: Contribution of Shell Cansolv to SaskPower Boundary Dam ICCS ProjectEnergy Procedia, 2014
- The outlook for improved carbon capture technologyProgress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2012
- Using auxiliary gas power for CCS energy needs in retrofitted coal power plantsEnergy Procedia, 2011