Regional and Institutional Variation in the Initiation of Early Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders
- 8 August 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 165 (15), 1705-12
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.165.15.1705
Abstract
Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders are an important step in decision making about aggressiveness of care for patients in hospitals. The use of DNR orders is known to vary with patient characteristics, but few studies have investigated the role of hospital factors or of regional variation. We examined these influences on the use of early DNR orders (written or =80 years). In multivariate analyses, the odds of having early DNR orders written were significantly lower in for-profit (vs private nonprofit) hospitals, higher in the smallest (vs the largest) hospitals, and lower in academic (vs nonacademic) hospitals. Standardized rates of DNR order use varied 10-fold across counties. The highest rates were among patients from rural areas. However, variation in use did not correspond well to county population, hospital bed availability, or population density. Hospital characteristics appear to be associated with the use of DNR orders, even after accounting for differences in patient characteristics. This association reflects institutional culture, technological bent, and physician practice patterns. If these factors do not match patient preferences, then improvements in care are needed.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Changes in the use of do-not-resuscitate orders after implementation of the patient self-determination actJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2003
- Quality Indicators for End-of-Life Care in Vulnerable EldersAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2001
- Sociodemographic Factors and the Assignment of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in Patients With Acute Myocardial InfarctionsMedical Care, 2000
- Increased Risk of Death in Patients With Do-Not-Resuscitate OrdersMedical Care, 1999
- Racial variation in the use of do-not-resuscitate ordersJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1999
- Changes Over Time in the Use of Do Not Resuscitate Orders and the Outcomes of Patients Receiving ThemMedical Care, 1997
- Functional status among survivors of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. SUPPORT Investigators Study to Understand Progress and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of TreatmentArchives of Internal Medicine, 1997
- Outcomes of patients with do-not-resuscitate orders. Toward an understanding of what do-not-resuscitate orders mean and how they affect patientsArchives of Internal Medicine, 1995
- Epidemiology of do-not-resuscitate orders. Disparity by age, diagnosis, gender, race, and functional impairmentArchives of Internal Medicine, 1995
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987