Comparison of Three Production Scenarios for Buxus microphylla var. japonica ‘Green Beauty’ Marketed in a No. 3 Container on the West Coast Using Life Cycle Assessment
- 1 March 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Horticultural Science in HortScience
- Vol. 52 (3), 357-365
- https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci11596-16
Abstract
Three scenarios for production of Buxus microphylla var. japonica [(Mull. Arg.) Rehder & E.H. Wilson] ‘Green Beauty’ marketed in a no. 3 container on the west coast of the United States were modeled based on grower interviews and best management practices. Life cycle inventories (LCIs) of input products, equipment use, and labor were developed from the protocols for those scenarios and a life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted to determine impact of individual components on the greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) and the subsequent carbon footprint (CF) of the product at the nursery gate and in the landscape. CF is expressed in global warming potential (GWP) for a 100-year period in units of kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalents (kg CO2e). The GWP of the plant from Scenario A (propagation to no. 1 to 3 container) was 2.198 kg CO2e with variable costs of $4.043. Scenario B (propagation to field to no. 3 container) would result in a GWP of 1.717 kg CO2e with variable costs of $2.880 and take a year longer in production than the other two models. The GWP of Scenario C (propagation to no. 1 to no. 2 to no. 3 containers) would be 3.364 kg CO2e with variable costs of $5.733. Containers, transplants/transplanting, irrigation, and fertilization input products and associated activities accounted for the greatest portion of GHG and variable costs in each scenario. Pruning, assembling/load trucks, pesticides, and chlorination were other important components to variable costs of each scenario but had little impact on GWP. Otherwise, the major contributors to GWP are also major contributors to cost.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Green House Gases(GHG) emissions from the ornamental plant nursery industry: a Life Cycle Assessment(LCA) approach in a nursery district in central ItalyJournal of Cleaner Production, 2016
- Assessing environmental impacts of nursery production: methodological issues and results from a case study in ItalyJournal of Cleaner Production, 2014
- The Effects of Individual Environmental Concerns on Willingness to Pay for Sustainable Plant AttributesHortScience, 2014
- Life cycle assessment of a field-grown red maple tree to estimate its carbon footprint componentsThe International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2012
- A life cycle greenhouse gas inventory of a tree production systemThe International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2011
- Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effectsAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2009
- Life cycle assessment of native plants and marginal lands for bioenergy agriculture in Kentucky as a model for south‐eastern USAGCB Bioenergy, 2009
- Geographical variation in carbon dioxide fluxes from soils in agro‐ecosystems and its implications for life‐cycle assessmentJournal of Applied Ecology, 2009
- Environmental impact assessment for a farming region: a review of methodsAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2005
- Carbon emission from farm operationsEnvironment International, 2004