Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 15 June 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- Vol. 7 (1), 16
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-7-16
Abstract
Supporting 21st century health care and the practice of evidence-based medicine (EBM) requires ubiquitous access to clinical information and to knowledge-based resources to answer clinical questions. Many questions go unanswered, however, due to lack of skills in formulating questions, crafting effective search strategies, and accessing databases to identify best levels of evidence. This randomized trial was designed as a pilot study to measure the relevancy of search results using three different interfaces for the PubMed search system. Two of the search interfaces utilized a specific framework called PICO, which was designed to focus clinical questions and to prompt for publication type or type of question asked. The third interface was the standard PubMed interface readily available on the Web. Study subjects were recruited from interns and residents on an inpatient general medicine rotation at an academic medical center in the US. Thirty-one subjects were randomized to one of the three interfaces, given 3 clinical questions, and asked to search PubMed for a set of relevant articles that would provide an answer for each question. The success of the search results was determined by a precision score, which compared the number of relevant or gold standard articles retrieved in a result set to the total number of articles retrieved in that set. Participants using the PICO templates (Protocol A or Protocol B) had higher precision scores for each question than the participants who used Protocol C, the standard PubMed Web interface. (Question 1: A = 35%, B = 28%, C = 20%; Question 2: A = 5%, B = 6%, C = 4%; Question 3: A = 1%, B = 0%, C = 0%) 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the precision for each question using a lower boundary of zero. However, the 95% confidence limits were overlapping, suggesting no statistical difference between the groups. Due to the small number of searches for each arm, this pilot study could not demonstrate a statistically significant difference between the search protocols. However there was a trend towards higher precision that needs to be investigated in a larger study to determine if PICO can improve the relevancy of search results.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Faculty Opinions recommendation of Evaluation of PICO as a knowledge representation for clinical questions.Published by H1 Connect ,2007
- Family medicine residents do not ask better-formulated clinical questions as they advance in their training.2005
- Why Do Residents Fail to Answer Their Clinical Questions? A Qualitative Study of Barriers to Practicing Evidence-Based MedicineAcademic Medicine, 2005
- Do Online Information Retrieval Systems Help Experienced Clinicians Answer Clinical Questions?Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2005
- A Web-based Compendium of Clinical Questions and Medical Evidence to Educate Internal Medicine ResidentsAcademic Medicine, 2003
- Obstacles to answering doctors' questions about patient care with evidence: qualitative studyBMJ, 2002
- Robustness of empirical search strategies for clinical content in MEDLINE.2002
- Residents’ medical information needs in clinic: are they being met?The American Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Using the clinical question to teach search strategy: fostering transferable conceptual skills in user education by active learningHealth Libraries Review, 1997
- Effect of online literature searching on length of stay and patient care costsAcademic Medicine, 1994