Early Identification and Management of Psychological Risk Factors (“Yellow Flags”) in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Reappraisal
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 May 2011
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in PTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal
- Vol. 91 (5), 737-753
- https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20100224
Abstract
Originally the term “yellow flags” was used to describe psychosocial prognostic factors for the development of disability following the onset of musculoskeletal pain. The identification of yellow flags through early screening was expected to prompt the application of intervention guidelines to achieve secondary prevention. In recent conceptualizations of yellow flags, it has been suggested that their range of applicability should be confined primarily to psychological risk factors to differentiate them from other risk factors, such as social and environmental variables. This article addresses 2 specific questions that arise from this development: (1) Can yellow flags influence outcomes in people with acute or subacute low back pain? and (2) Can yellow flags be targeted in interventions to produce better outcomes? Consistent evidence has been found to support the role of various psychological factors in prognosis, although questions remain about which factors are the most important, both individually and in combination, and how they affect outcomes. Published early interventions have reported mixed results, but, overall, the evidence suggests that targeting yellow flags, particularly when they are at high levels, does seem to lead to more consistently positive results than either ignoring them or providing omnibus interventions to people regardless of psychological risk factors. Psychological risk factors for poor prognosis can be identified clinically and addressed within interventions, but questions remain in relation to issues such as timing, necessary skills, content of treatments, and context. In addition, there is still a need to elucidate mechanisms of change and better integrate this understanding into the broader context of secondary prevention of chronic pain and disability.Keywords
This publication has 62 references indexed in Scilit:
- Subgrouping low back pain: A comparison of the STarT Back Tool with the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening QuestionnaireEuropean journal of pain, 2010
- Identification of prognostic factors for chronicity in patients with low back pain: a review of screening instrumentsInternational Orthopaedics, 2009
- A randomized trial of behavioral physical therapy interventions for acute and sub-acute low back pain (NCT00373867)Pain, 2008
- A primary care back pain screening tool: Identifying patient subgroups for initial treatmentArthritis Care & Research, 2008
- A randomised clinical trial of subgrouping and targeted treatment for low back pain compared with best current care. The STarT Back Trial Study ProtocolBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2008
- Structured Early Consultation with the Occupational Physician Reduces Sickness Absence Among Office Workers at High Risk for Long-Term Sickness Absence: a Randomized Controlled TrialJournal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2008
- Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation for Subacute Low Back Pain: Graded Activity or Workplace Intervention or Both?Spine, 2007
- The Fear-Avoidance Model of Musculoskeletal Pain: Current State of Scientific EvidenceJournal of Behavioral Medicine, 2006
- Fear avoidance and prognosis in back pain: A systematic review and synthesis of current evidenceArthritis & Rheumatism, 2006
- Return-to-Work Interventions for Low Back PainSports Medicine, 2002