Improving access for the poorest to public sector health services: insights from Kirivong Operational Health District in Cambodia
Open Access
- 17 November 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Health Policy and Planning
- Vol. 21 (1), 27-39
- https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czj001
Abstract
This article presents research findings into the effectiveness of an innovative equity fund approach to improving access to public sector health services for the poor in Kirivong Operational Health District in Cambodia. The operational health district is the lowest organizational level in the Cambodian health system, providing services through health centres and a single referral hospital. An equity fund involves a third party identifying the poor and paying user fees on their behalf by reimbursing the service provider, thus relieving health staff of such responsibility. We explore the appropriateness of utilizing community members to identify the poorest. The impact of newly introduced pagoda-managed equity funds on access to public health services for the poorest, and on their out-of-pocket expenditure during illness episodes, is then examined. We conclude with an evaluation of the contribution of the equity funds to community participation. The research indicates that identification by community members of those eligible for equity funds is feasible, accrues minimal direct costs, and is effective. Households identified as eligible for equity fund benefits were poorer than those identified as non-beneficiaries. Direct costs associated with seeking care were considerably lower for equity fund beneficiaries than for non-beneficiaries, and fewer beneficiaries than non-beneficiaries initially consulted the private sector, providing evidence of the equity fund's ability to attract the poorest to the public sector. The level and nature of community participation was enhanced considerably following the introduction of the pagoda-managed equity funds. In order to maximize and sustain the equity benefits of such funds, we recommend that external agencies (such as international non-governmental organizations) limit their role to the provision of technical support and advice, rather than taking the lead on implementation and administration. Facilitating the design, implementation, administration and management of equity funds by indigenous community-based organizations has the advantage of not only greatly reducing administrative costs, allowing a large proportion of the fund to be spent on services for the poor, but also of enhancing local ownership, thus increasing the likelihood of equity funds being sustained in the future.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of health-seeking behaviour between poor and better-off people after health sector reform in CambodiaPublic Health, 2004
- Global concepts and local meaning: human rights and Buddhism in CambodiaJournal of Human Rights, 2003
- Changing health-seeking behaviour in Matlab, Bangladesh: do development interventions matter?Health Policy and Planning, 2003
- Applying an equity lens to child health and mortality: more of the same is not enoughThe Lancet, 2003
- How well do health programmes reach the poor?The Lancet, 2003
- Inequities among the very poor: health care for children in rural southern TanzaniaThe Lancet, 2003
- Protecting the poor under cost recovery: the role of means testingHealth Policy and Planning, 1995
- The political economy of user fees with targeting: Developing equitable health financing policyJournal of International Development, 1995
- Exempting the poor: The experience of ThailandSocial Science & Medicine, 1991
- Primary health care: on measuring participationSocial Science & Medicine, 1988