Prognostic significance of electrocardiographic Q-waves in a low-risk population
Open Access
- 24 January 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in EP Europace
- Vol. 14 (7), 1012-1017
- https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eur409
Abstract
In individuals without known heart disease, electrocardiographic Q-waves predict a poor prognosis. We aimed to examine whether prognostic information can be derived from the size and location of Q-waves in persons from the general population without known ischaemic heart disease (IHD) or heart failure (HF). Electrocardiograms (ECGs) of 5381 persons without known IHD or HF from the 4th Copenhagen City Heart Study were reviewed and Q-waves were classified according to their size and location. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to examine the associations of Q-waves adjusted for age, hypertension, diabetes, and estimated glomerular filtration rate with the risk of the combined endpoint of death and hospitalization for IHD. During a median of 7.8 years of follow-up, 1003 persons reached the combined endpoint. One hundred and fourteen (2.1%) had pathological Q-waves, of whom 44% suffered from an event compared with 18% from the control group, P< 0.001. Persons with hypertension, diabetes, and impaired renal function were more likely to have Q-waves. Even small Q-waves (i.e. Minnesota code 1.2.x-1.3.x) were associated with a poor prognosis, hazard ratio (HR) 1.4 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0–2.0; P< 0.05], though not as grave as large Q-waves (i.e. Minnesota code 1.1.x) HR 2.8 (95%CI: 1.6–5.0; P< 0.001). Conversely, there was no difference in the outcome of patients with anteriorly HR 1.6 (95%CI: 1.1–2.4) vs. posteriorly HR 1.5 (95%CI: 0.9–2.4) located Q-waves (P= 0.85). In the general population without known IHD or HF, even small Q-waves in the ECG are associated with a poor prognosis.This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incidence of recognized and unrecognized myocardial infarction in men and women aged 55 and older: the Rotterdam StudyEuropean Heart Journal, 2006
- Occurrence of unrecognized myocardial infarction in subjects aged 45 to 65 years (the ARIC study)The American Journal of Cardiology, 2002
- Unrecognized Myocardial InfarctionAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2001
- The natural history of prevalent ischaemic heart disease in middle-aged menEuropean Heart Journal, 2000
- Prevalence, predisposing factors, and prognosis of clinically unrecognized myocardial infarction in the elderlyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1999
- Incidence and prevalence of recognised and unrecognised myocardial infarction in women. The Reykjavik Study.European Heart Journal, 1998
- Prevalence, incidence and prognosis of recognized and unrecognized myocardial infarction in persons aged 75 years or older: The Bronx Aging StudyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- Development and evolution of electrocardiographic Minnesota Q-QS codes in patients with acute myocardial infarctionAmerican Heart Journal, 1985
- Incidence and Prognosis of Unrecognized Myocardial InfarctionThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Clinically unrecognized myocardial infarction in the Western Collaborative Group Study∗The American Journal of Cardiology, 1967