Comparing routine administrative data with registry data for assessing quality of hospital care in patients with myocardial infarction using deterministic record linkage
Open Access
- 21 October 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 16 (1), 1-9
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1840-5
Abstract
Assessment of quality of care in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) should be based on data that effectively enable determination of quality. With the need to simplify measurement techniques, the question arises whether routine data can be used for this purpose. We therefore compared data from a German sickness fund (AOK) with data from the Berlin Myocardial Infarction Registry (BMIR). We included patients hospitalised for treatment of MI in Berlin from 2009-2011. We matched 2305 patients from AOK and BMIR by using deterministic record linkage with indirect identifiers. For matched patients we compared the frequency in documentation between AOK and BMIR for quality assurance variables and calculated the kappa coefficient (KC) as a measure of agreement. There was almost perfect agreement in documentation between AOK and BMIR data for matched patients for: catheter laboratory (KC: 0.874), ST elevation MI (KC: 0.826), diabetes (KC: 0.818), percutaneous coronary intervention (KC: 0.860) and hospital mortality (KC: 0.952). The remaining variables compared showed moderate or less than moderate agreement (KC < 0.6), and were grouped in Category II with less frequent documentation in AOK for risk factors and aspects of patients’ history; in Category III with more frequent documentation in AOK for comorbidities; and in Category IV for medication at and after hospital discharge. Routine data are primarily collected and defined for reimbursement purposes. Quality assurance represents merely a secondary use. This explains why only a limited number of variables showed almost perfect agreement in documentation between AOK and BMIR. If routine data are to be used for quality assessment, they must be constantly monitored and further developed for this new application. Furthermore, routine data should be complemented with registry data by well-established methods of record linkage to realistically reflect the situation – also for those quality-associated variables not collected in routine data.Keywords
Funding Information
- German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (01GY1112)
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Acute myocardial infarction and diagnosis-related groups: patient classification and hospital reimbursement in 11 European countriesEuropean Heart Journal, 2013
- Increased registration of hypertension and cancer diagnoses after the introduction of a new reimbursement systemScandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 2012
- How accurate is the reporting of stroke in hospital discharge data? A pilot validation study using a population-based stroke registry as controlZeitschrift für Neurologie, 2012
- Method for developing national quality indicators based on manual data extraction from medical recordsBMJ Quality & Safety, 2012
- A retrospective cohort study assessing patient characteristics and the incidence of cardiovascular disease using linked routine primary and secondary care dataBMJ Open, 2012
- Systematic review of discharge coding accuracyJournal of Public Health, 2011
- Concordance and robustness of quality indicator sets for hospitals: an analysis of routine dataBMC Health Services Research, 2011
- Do inter-hospital comparisons of in-hospital, acute myocardial infarction case-fatality rates serve the purpose of fostering quality improvement? An evaluative studyBMC Health Services Research, 2010
- Measuring agreement of administrative data with chart data using prevalence unadjusted and adjusted kappaBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2009
- Comparison of hospital episode statistics and central cardiac audit database in public reporting of congenital heart surgery mortalityBMJ, 2007