Comparison of ambient aerosol extinction coefficients obtained from in-situ, MAX-DOAS and LIDAR measurements at Cabauw
Open Access
- 18 March 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Vol. 11 (6), 2603-2624
- https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2603-2011
Abstract
In the field, aerosol in-situ measurements are often performed under dry conditions (relative humidity RHsp(λ) was measured dry and at various, predefined RH conditions between 20 and 95% with a humidified nephelometer. The scattering enhancement factor f(RH,λ) is the key parameter to describe the effect of RH on σsp(λ) and is defined as σsp(RH,λ) measured at a certain RH divided by the dry σsp(dry,λ). The measurement of f(RH,λ) together with the dry absorption measurement (assumed not to change with RH) allows the determination of the actual extinction coefficient σep(RH,λ) at ambient RH. In addition, a wide range of other aerosol properties were measured in parallel. The measurements were used to characterize the effects of RH on the aerosol optical properties. A closure study showed the consistency of the aerosol in-situ measurements. Due to the large variability of air mass origin (and thus aerosol composition) a simple parameterization of f(RH,λ) could not be established. If f(RH,λ) needs to be predicted, the chemical composition and size distribution need to be known. Measurements of four MAX-DOAS (multi-axis differential optical absorption spectroscopy) instruments were used to retrieve vertical profiles of σep(λ). The values of the lowest layer were compared to the in-situ values after conversion of the latter ones to ambient RH. The comparison showed a good correlation of R2 = 0.62–0.78, but the extinction coefficients from MAX-DOAS were a factor of 1.5–3.4 larger than the in-situ values. Best agreement is achieved for a few cases characterized by low aerosol optical depths and low planetary boundary layer heights. Differences were shown to be dependent on the applied MAX-DOAS retrieval algorithm. The comparison of the in-situ extinction data to a Raman LIDAR (light detection and ranging) showed a good correlation and higher values measured by the LIDAR (R2 = 0.82−0.85, slope of 1.69–1.76) if the Raman retrieved profile was used to extrapolate the directly measured extinction coefficient to the ground. The comparison improved if only nighttime measurements were used in the comparison (R2 = 0.96, slope of 1.12).Keywords
This publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- Enhancement of the aerosol direct radiative effect by semi-volatile aerosol components: airborne measurements in North-Western EuropeAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2010
- Effects of relative humidity on aerosol light scattering in the ArcticAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2010
- MAX-DOAS measurements of formaldehyde in the Po-ValleyAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2005
- Mixtures of pollution, dust, sea salt, and volcanic aerosol during ACE‐Asia: Radiative properties as a function of relative humidityJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2003
- Absorption of light by soot particles: determination of the absorption coefficient by means of aethalometersJournal of Aerosol Science, 2003
- MAX‐DOAS measurements of BrO and NO2 in the marine boundary layerGeophysical Research Letters, 2003
- Aerosol optical depth measurements during the Aerosols99 experimentJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2001
- Four years of continuous surface aerosol measurements from the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Southern Great Plains Cloud and Radiation Testbed siteJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2001
- Humidification factors of aerosols from biomass burning in BrazilJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1998
- Raman lidar measurements of aerosol extinction and backscattering: 1. Methods and comparisonsJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1998