Sizing of riprap for spill-through abutments
- 1 November 2010
- journal article
- Published by Thomas Telford Ltd. in Proceedings of the ICE - Water Management
- Vol. 163 (10), 499-507
- https://doi.org/10.1680/wama.900024
Abstract
An experimental investigation of riprap stability at spill-through abutments has been carried out in two similar horizontal-bed flumes, avoiding riprap failure modes other than shear failure and erosion failure. Tests were conducted for two common abutment side slopes, sub-critical flow regime, short to intermediate abutment lengths and high bed roughness. The aim of the experiments was to determine the size of stone riprap necessary to resist (a) shear failure in aprons placed at the base of spill-through abutments, and (b) erosion failure over their side slopes. Results are compared with predictions of stone riprap size given by expressions found in the literature. The predictor of Pagán–Ortiz is confirmed as being appropriate for shear failure at abutment aprons and can be adapted to account for erosion failure over abutment side slopes. Alternatively, two new expressions, written in terms of the (critical) approach flow intensity required to make the riprap stones move, are suggested. An experimental investigation of riprap stability at spill-through abutments has been carried out in two similar horizontal-bed flumes, avoiding riprap failure modes other than shear failure and erosion failure. Tests were conducted for two common abutment side slopes, sub-critical flow regime, short to intermediate abutment lengths and high bed roughness. The aim of the experiments was to determine the size of stone riprap necessary to resist (a) shear failure in aprons placed at the base of spill-through abutments, and (b) erosion failure over their side slopes. Results are compared with predictions of stone riprap size given by expressions found in the literature. The predictor of Pagán–Ortiz is confirmed as being appropriate for shear failure at abutment aprons and can be adapted to account for erosion failure over abutment side slopes. Alternatively, two new expressions, written in terms of the (critical) approach flow intensity required to make the riprap stones move, are suggested.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Protecting Vertical-Wall Abutments with Riprap MattressesJournal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2009
- Local Scour and Riprap Stability at an Abutment in a Degrading BedJournal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2008
- Large-Scale Flume Tests of Riprap-Apron Performance at a Bridge Abutment on a FloodplainJournal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2008
- Spur Failure in River EngineeringJournal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2008
- Riprap Size Selection at Wing-Wall AbutmentsJournal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2007
- Generalized Approach for Clear-Water Scour at Bridge Foundation ElementsJournal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2007
- Geobag Performance as Scour Countermeasure for Bridge AbutmentsJournal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2007
- Scour Countermeasures for Wing-Wall AbutmentsJournal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2006
- Countermeasure Toe Protection at Spill-Through AbutmentsJournal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2006
- Shields’ Entrainment Criterion in Bridge HydraulicsJournal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2002