Wave Separation, Wave Intensity, the Reservoir-Wave Concept, and the Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio
- 1 July 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Hypertension
- Vol. 66 (1), 93-98
- https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.115.05567
Abstract
Wave separation analysis and wave intensity analysis (WIA) use (aortic) pressure and flow to separate them in their forward and backward (reflected) waves. While wave separation analysis uses measured pressure and flow, WIA uses their derivatives. Because differentiation emphasizes rapid changes, WIA suppresses slow (diastolic) fluctuations of the waves and renders diastole a seemingly wave-free period. However, integration of the WIA-obtained forward and backward waves is equal to the wave separation analysis–obtained waves. Both the methods thus give similar results including backward waves spanning systole and diastole. Nevertheless, this seemingly wave-free period in diastole formed the basis of both the reservoir-wave concept and the Instantaneous wave-Free Ratio of (iFR) pressure and flow. The reservoir-wave concept introduces a reservoir pressure, P res , (Frank Windkessel) as a wave-less phenomenon. Because this Windkessel model falls short in systole an excess pressure, P exc , is introduced, which is assumed to have wave properties. The reservoir-wave concept, however, is internally inconsistent. The presumed wave-less P res equals twice the backward pressure wave and travels, arriving later in the distal aorta. Hence, in contrast, P exc is minimally affected by wave reflections. Taken together, P res seems to behave as a wave, rather than P exc . The iFR is also not without flaws, as easily demonstrated when applied to the aorta. The ratio of diastolic aortic pressure and flow implies division by zero giving nonsensical results. In conclusion, presumptions based on WIA have led to misconceptions that violate physical principles, and reservoir-wave concept and iFR should be abandoned.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is the Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Equivalent to Fractional Flow Reserve?Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2013
- Magnitude and return time of the reflected waveJournal of Hypertension, 2012
- Development and Validation of a New Adenosine-Independent Index of Stenosis Severity From Coronary Wave–Intensity Analysis: Results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) StudyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2012
- Reservations on the reservoirJournal of Hypertension, 2012
- The arterial reservoir pressure increases with aging and is the major determinant of the aortic augmentation indexAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 2010
- The reservoir pressure concept: the 3-element windkessel model revisited? Application to the Asklepios population studyJournal of Engineering Mathematics, 2009
- Location of a Reflection Site Is ElusiveHypertension, 2008
- Noninvasive (Input) Impedance, Pulse Wave Velocity, and Wave Reflection in Healthy Middle-Aged Men and WomenHypertension, 2007
- Determination of wave speed and wave separation in the arteriesJournal of Biomechanics, 2001
- Forward and Backward Running Waves in the Arteries: Analysis Using the Method of CharacteristicsJournal of Biomechanical Engineering, 1990