Value of Information on Preference Heterogeneity and Individualized Care
- 1 March 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Medical Decision Making
- Vol. 27 (2), 112-127
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X06297393
Abstract
Background . Cost-effectiveness analysis traditionally focuses on identifying when treatments are cost-effective based on their average benefits and costs in the population. However, there may be considerable value in identifying when treatments are cost-effective for individual patients given their preferences or other personal attributes. Objectives . To present a theoretical framework to assess the potential value of identifying cost-effective treatments for individual patients given their preferences and to compare the value of individualized treatment decisions with the value of treatment decisions based on traditional population-level cost-effectiveness analysis. Methods . The authors calculate the expected value of individualized care (EVIC), which represents the potential value of providing physicians information on the preferences of individual patients, such as quality-of-life (QOL) weights, so as to make individualized treatment decisions. They also show how EVIC varies with insurance structures that do not internalize relative costs of treatments. They illustrate this theory using an example in which physicians make treatment choices for 65-year-old prostate cancer patients. Results . The value of identifying cost-effective treatments at the individual level for 65-year-old prostate cancer patients in the United States is about $70 million annually. This is more than 100 times the $0.7 million annual value of identifying the cost-effective treatment on average for this population. However, failure to internalize costs almost eliminates the value of individualized care. Conclusions . The value of individualizing care can be far greater than the value of improved decision making at the group level. However, this can vary immensely with insurance. EVIC can provide a guide as to when the high value of individualized care may make population-level decision making especially at risk of providing poor guidance for coverage decisions. Future studies of the value of individualized care should also consider baseline levels of individualization of care. Key words: preferences; value of information; individualization of care; quality of life; prostate cancer. (Med Decis Making 2007; 27: 112—127)Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patient Race/Ethnicity and Quality of Patient–Physician Communication During Medical VisitsAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2004
- Patient-based outcome results from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practiceFamily Practice, 2004
- Patient-physician communication about end-of-life care for patients with severe COPDEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2004
- Functional health literacy and the quality of physician–patient communication among diabetes patientsPatient Education and Counseling, 2004
- Effects of Decision Aids for Menorrhagia on Treatment Choices, Health Outcomes, and CostsJAMA, 2002
- The Danger of Applying Group-level Utilities in Decision Analyses of the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer in Individual PatientsMedical Decision Making, 1998
- Five‐Hundred Life‐Saving Interventions and Their Cost‐EffectivenessRisk Analysis, 1995
- CommentaryMedical Care, 1985
- Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of ImagesIeee Transactions On Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1984
- Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under RiskEconometrica, 1979