Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities
- 1 July 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Vol. 38 (7), 687-694
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02048023
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess whether any method of hemorrhoid therapy has been shown to be superior in randomized, controlled trials. A meta-analysis was performed of all randomized, controlled trials assessing two or more treatment modalities for symptomatic hemorrhoids. Outcome variables included response to therapy, need for further therapy, complications, and pain. A total of 18 trials were available for analysis. Hemorrhoidectomy was found to be significantly more effective than manual dilation of the anus (P=0.0017), with less need for further therapy (P=0.034), no significant difference in complications (P=0.60), but significantly more pain (PCONCLUSION: Rubber band ligation is recommended as the initial mode of therapy for Grades 1 to 3 hemorrhoids. Although hemorrhoidectomy showed better response rates, it is associated with more complications and pain than rubber band ligation, thus should be reserved for patients who fail to respond to rubber band ligation.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment of advanced hemorrhoidal diseaseDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1993
- Randomized trial comparing diathermy hemorrhoidectomy with the scissor dissection Milligan-Morgan operationDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1993
- Clinical studies in surgical journals—have we improved?Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1993
- A prospective crossover trial of direct current electrotherapy in symptomatic hemorrhoidal diseaseGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1991
- Prospective randomised comparison of current coagulation and injection sclerotherapy for the outpatient treatment of haemorrhoidsInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease, 1991
- Meta-analysis of clinical trials: Summary of an international conferenceEuropean Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1988
- Submucosal versus ligation excision haemorrhoidectomy: A comparison of anal sensation, anal sphincter manometry and postoperative pain and functionBritish Journal of Surgery, 1987
- Methods for combining randomized clinical trials: Strengths and limitationsStatistics in Medicine, 1987
- The Importance of Beta, the Type II Error and Sample Size in the Design and Interpretation of the Randomized Control TrialThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Anal dilatation versus rubber band ligation for internal hemorrhoids: Method of treatment in outpatientsThe American Journal of Surgery, 1971