Recipes or blueprints for our genes? How contexts selectively activate the multiple meanings of metaphors
- 1 August 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Quarterly Journal of Speech
- Vol. 88 (3), 303-325
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630209384379
Abstract
In the 1990s, critics of public discourse about genetics urged the replacement of the “blueprint” metaphor with the “recipe” metaphor. The subsequent appearance of the “recipe” metaphor in the mass media did not carry the expected reduction of genetic determinism, however. To account for the failure of the critical predictions, this essay extends Josef Stern's contextually based semantic theory of metaphor to a polyvocal theory of how metaphors develop particular patterns of social usage. The essay employs a multi‐methodological approach using two different audience studies and textual analyses of focus group transcripts and news texts to trace the blueprint and recipe metaphors from the “productive” set of potential meanings to the ‘filter” set of contextually activated meanings.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Issues in the use of I. A. Richards’ tenor‐vehicle model of metaphorWestern Journal of Communication, 2000
- Polysemy: Multiple meanings in rhetorical criticismQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1998
- The Argumentative Burdens of Audience Conjectures: Audience Research in Popular Culture CriticismCommunication Theory, 1998
- Telling Stories: Metaphors of the Human Genome ProjectHypatia, 1995
- Led (astray) by genetic maps: The cartography of the human genome and health careSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 1992
- Names and weaponsCommunication Monographs, 1989
- The rhetoric of nukespeakCommunication Monographs, 1989
- The rhetorical limits of polysemyCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1989
- Metaphor and the rhetorical invention of cold war “idealists”Communication Monographs, 1987
- What Metaphors MeanCritical Inquiry, 1978