Diet and the environment: does what you eat matter?
- 1 May 2009
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Vol. 89 (5), 1699S-1703S
- https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2009.26736z
Abstract
Food demand influences agricultural production. Modern agricultural practices have resulted in polluted soil, air, and water; eroded soil; dependence on imported oil; and loss of biodiversity. The goal of this research was to compare the environmental effect of a vegetarian and nonvegetarian diet in California in terms of agricultural production inputs, including pesticides and fertilizers, water, and energy used to produce commodities. The working assumption was that a greater number and amount of inputs were associated with a greater environmental effect. The literature supported this notion. To accomplish this goal, dietary preferences were quantified with the Adventist Health Study, and California state agricultural data were collected and applied to state commodity production statistics. These data were used to calculate different dietary consumption patterns and indexes to compare the environmental effect associated with dietary preference. Results show that, for the combined differential production of 11 food items for which consumption differs among vegetarians and nonvegetarians, the nonvegetarian diet required 2.9 times more water, 2.5 times more primary energy, 13 times more fertilizer, and 1.4 times more pesticides than did the vegetarian diet. The greatest contribution to the differences came from the consumption of beef in the diet. We found that a nonvegetarian diet exacts a higher cost on the environment relative to a vegetarian diet. From an environmental perspective, what a person chooses to eat makes a difference.This publication has 75 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is equol the key to the efficacy of soy foods?The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2009
- Nuts and health outcomes: new epidemiologic evidenceThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2009
- Mortality in British vegetarians: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Oxford)The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2009
- Vegetarian diets: what do we know of their effects on common chronic diseases?The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2009
- A low-fat vegan diet and a conventional diabetes diet in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled, 74-wk clinical trialThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2009
- Dietary change and reduced breast cancer events among women without hot flashes after treatment of early-stage breast cancer: subgroup analysis of the Women’s Healthy Eating and Living StudyThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2009
- Interindividual differences in response to plant-based diets: implications for cancer riskThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2009
- Food synergy: an operational concept for understanding nutritionThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2009
- Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidencePhilosophical Transactions B, 2007
- Environmental and Economic Costs of Pesticide UseBioScience, 1992