Cubic versus Spherical Magnetic Nanoparticles: The Role of Surface Anisotropy
Top Cited Papers
- 11 September 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Vol. 130 (40), 13234-13239
- https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0768744
Abstract
The magnetic properties of maghemite (γ-Fe2O3) cubic and spherical nanoparticles of similar sizes have been experimentally and theoretically studied. The blocking temperature, TB, of the nanoparticles depends on their shape, with the spherical ones exhibiting larger TB. Other low temperature properties such as saturation magnetization, coercivity, loop shift or spin canting are rather similar. The experimental effective anisotropy and the Monte Carlo simulations indicate that the different random surface anisotropy of the two morphologies combined with the low magnetocrystalline anisotropy of γ-Fe2O3 is the origin of these effects.This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- Magnetism and structure of chemically disorderednanocubesPhysical Review B, 2007
- Exchange bias in nanostructuresPhysics Reports, 2005
- Mesoscopic Solid Structures of 11-nm Maghemite, γ-Fe2O3, Nanocrystals: Experiment and TheoryLangmuir, 2005
- Dipolar interaction and size effects in powder samples of colloidal iron oxide nanoparticlesNanotechnology, 2005
- Correlation between topography and magnetic surface anisotropy in epitaxialfilms on vicinal-to-(001)surfaces with different step orientationPhysical Review B, 2004
- Size‐Dependent Magnetic Properties of Colloidal Mn3O4 and MnO NanoparticlesAngewandte Chemie, 2004
- The preparation of magnetic nanoparticles for applications in biomedicineJournal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2003
- Window and mixing effects in the dynamics of an LN2Raman laserJournal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2002
- Surface and Internal Spin Canting in γ-Fe2O3 NanoparticlesChemistry of Materials, 1999
- Atomistic simulation of the surface structure of spinelJournal of Materials Chemistry, 1994