Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: designing, analyzing, and reporting cluster randomized controlled trials
Open Access
- 1 August 2015
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Vol. 102 (2), 241-248
- https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.114.105072
Abstract
Cluster randomized controlled trials (cRCTs; also known as group randomized trials and community-randomized trials) are multilevel experiments in which units that are randomly assigned to experimental conditions are sets of grouped individuals, whereas outcomes are recorded at the individual level. In human cRCTs, clusters that are randomly assigned are typically families, classrooms, schools, work-sites, or counties. With growing interest in community-based, public health, and policy interventions to reduce obesity or improve nutrition, the use of cRCTs has increased. Errors in the design, analysis, and interpretation of cRCTs are unfortunately all too common. This situation seems to stem in part from investigator confusion about how the unit of randomization affects causal inferences and the statistical procedures required for the valid estimation and testing of effects. In this article, we provide a brief introduction and overview of the importance of cRCTs and highlight and explain important considerations for the design, analysis, and reporting of cRCTs by using published examples.Funding Information
- National Institutes of Health
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trialsBMJ, 2012
- Including all individuals is not enough: Lessons for intention-to-treat analysisClinical Trials, 2012
- Getting carried away: a note showing baseline observation carried forward (BOCF) results can be calculated from published complete-cases resultsInternational Journal of Obesity, 2011
- Data with Hierarchical Structure: Impact of Intraclass Correlation and Sample Size on Type-I ErrorFrontiers in Psychology, 2011
- The Intra‐Cluster Correlation Coefficient in Cluster Randomized Trials: A Review of DefinitionsInternational Statistical Review, 2009
- Missing Data in Randomized Clinical Trials for Weight Loss: Scope of the Problem, State of the Field, and Performance of Statistical MethodsPLOS ONE, 2009
- Sample size calculations for 3-level cluster randomized trialsClinical Trials, 2008
- Allowing for imprecision of the intracluster correlation coefficient in the design of cluster randomized trialsStatistics in Medicine, 2004
- Are distinctive ethical principles required for cluster randomized controlled trials?Statistics in Medicine, 2001
- Power and money: Designing statistically powerful studies while minimizing financial costs.Psychological Methods, 1997