Using Samples to Estimate the Sensitivity and Specificity of a Surveillance Process
- 1 June 2008
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
- Vol. 29 (6), 559-563
- https://doi.org/10.1086/588203
Abstract
Determining sensitivity and specificity of a postoperative infection surveillance process is a difficult undertaking. Because postoperative infections are rare, vast numbers of negative results exist, and it is often not reasonable to assess them all. This study gives a methodological framework for estimating sensitivity and specificity by taking only a small sample of the number of patients who test negative and comparing their findings to the reference or “gold standard” rather than comparing the findings of all patients to the gold standard. It provides a formula for deriving confidence intervals for these estimates and a guide to minimum requirements for sampling results.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validation of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgical Site Infection Surveillance Data From a Statewide Surveillance System in AustraliaInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2007
- Patient outcomes after simultaneous bilateral total hip and knee joint replacementsJournal of Hospital Infection, 2007
- Validation of Surgical Site Infection Surveillance in The NetherlandsInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2007
- Statistical Analysis with Missing DataWiley Series in Probability and Statistics, 2002
- Bootstrap Methods and their ApplicationPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1997
- Recorded Criteria as a "Gold Standard" for Sensitivity and Specificity Estimates of Surveillance of Nosocomial Infection: A Novel Method to Measure Job PerformanceInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1995