Expertise and representation in financial institutions: UK legislation on pension fund governance and US regulation of the mutual fund industry
- 19 February 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Twenty-First Century Society
- Vol. 2 (1), 1-24
- https://doi.org/10.1080/17450140601101200
Abstract
Decision making is often the responsibility of committees, boards and agencies assuming that many issues are best resolved by smaller, specialised units of decision making. The product of ‘representative democracy’ and a pragmatic response to ‘large numbers’ and ‘complexity’, these bodies are thought to efficaciously combine representation with expertise. Governments use these types of institutions in a variety of ways, and have become a key institution of New Labour's ‘third way’. However, there is a growing tension between representation and expertise. If the former provides legitimacy for the latter, the latter may be compromised by the former in matters of requiring sophisticated judgement relative to market agents. It is argued that the tension between representation and expertise is growing for two reasons: perceived ‘shortfalls’ in democratic practice have prompted governments to broaden the representativeness of many public and private institutions set against an apparent need for greater levels of sophistication in decision making driven by financial markets. These arguments are developed through discussion of that which was inherited from 19th century liberalism, a set of analytical distinctions between deference and delegation, and two examples drawn from the UK and US finance industries. In conclusion, it is noted that apparent solutions, such as relying wholly upon experts, are fraught with danger: there may be such a disconnection between expertise and moral commitment that the former without the latter may give decisions that are hard to justify on any ground.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pension fund trustee competence: decision making in problems relevant to investment practiceJournal of Pension Economics and Finance, 2006
- Codes of Life: Identification Codes and the Machine-Readable WorldEnvironment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2005
- Does Skin in the Game Matter? Director Incentives and Governance in the Mutual Fund IndustrySSRN Electronic Journal, 2005
- Mutual Fund Flows and Performance in Rational MarketsJournal of Political Economy, 2004
- Pension fund governance: expertise and organizational formJournal of Pension Economics and Finance, 2004
- Evaluating the Audit ExplosionLaw & Policy, 2003
- Bubbles, Human Judgment, and Expert OpinionCFA Magazine, 2002
- What is the Problem with Experts?Social Studies of Science, 2001
- The Secret Life of the Trust: The Trust as an Instrument of CommerceThe Yale Law Journal, 1997
- DeferenceEthics, 1964