Comparison of two Dutch follow-up care models for spinal cord-injured patients and their impact on health problems, re-admissions and quality of care
Open Access
- 1 November 2007
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by SAGE Publications in Clinical Rehabilitation
- Vol. 21 (11), 997-1006
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215507079835
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate whether transmural care for people with spinal cord injury living in the community has more impact on health outcomes than traditional follow-up care within the Netherlands. Design: Quasi-experiment with 12 months of follow-up. Setting: Eight Dutch rehabilitation centres. Subjects: Thirty-one patients who received transmural care in two `experimental' rehabilitation centres were compared with a matched sample of 31 patients having received `usual follow-up care' in six other rehabilitation centres. Intervention: The core component of the transmural care consists of a transmural nurse, who `liaises' between former patients living in the community, primary care professionals and the rehabilitation team. The transmural care model provides activities to support patients and their family/partners and activities to promote continuity of care. Main measures: The prevalence of pressure sores and urinary tract infections; the number and duration of re-admissions to hospital and rehabilitation centre due to pressure sores, bladder and bowel problems; and the experienced quality of follow-up care. Results: The transmural care, as implemented, did not influence the health outcomes. The prevalence of pressure sores, urinary tract infections and the number of re-admissions (due to pressure sores, bladder and bowel problems) was respectively 13, 13 and 4 in the intervention group versus 14, 15 and 6 in the usual follow-up care group. Since the transmural care had been incompletely implemented and there were methodological and practical limitations, we formulated no final conclusions regarding its effectiveness. Conclusion: Implementing the transmural care model strictly according to protocol may improve its effectiveness.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Demographics of the Dutch multicenter prospective cohort study ‘Restoration of mobility in spinal cord injury rehabilitation’Spinal Cord, 2006
- Health problems of persons with spinal cord injury living in the NetherlandsDisability and Rehabilitation, 2005
- Etiology and incidence of rehospitalization after traumatic spinal cord injury: A multicenter analysisArchives Of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2004
- Utilization of health services following spinal cord injury: a 6-year follow-up studySpinal Cord, 2004
- Integrated care: meaning, logic, applications, and implications – a discussion paperInternational Journal of Integrated Care, 2002
- Integrated careInternational Journal of Integrated Care, 2001
- An epidemiological description of spinal cord injuries in The Netherlands in 1994Spinal Cord, 2000
- Spinal Cord Injury and Case ManagementTopics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, 1999
- Case Management: A Historical and Future Perspective of Its Influence on Outcome for Persons Who Have Sustained Spinal Cord InjuryTopics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, 1999
- Incidence of secondary complications in spinal cord injuryInternational Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 1996