Adenoma detection rate is necessary but insufficient for distinguishing high versus low endoscopist performance
- 1 January 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- Vol. 77 (1), 71-78
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.08.038
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Colonoscopy Reports and Current State of Performance MeasuresGastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America, 2010
- The natural history of adenomasBest Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology, 2010
- Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy and the Risk of Interval CancerThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Fewer Polyps Detected by Colonoscopy as the Day Progresses at a Veteran's Administration Teaching HospitalClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2009
- American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer Screening 2008The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2009
- Fellow Involvement May Increase Adenoma Detection Rates During ColonoscopyThe American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2008
- Colonoscopic Withdrawal Times and Adenoma Detection during Screening ColonoscopyThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- ASGE guideline: colorectal cancer screening and surveillanceGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2006
- Poor correlation between clinical impression, the small colonic polyp and their neoplastic riskJournal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2006
- Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: Clinical guidelines and rationale—Update based on new evidenceGastroenterology, 2003