Meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions
- 1 January 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Acta Radiologica
- Vol. 56 (1), 25-33
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185113517115
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a non-invasive method for the assessment of breast lesions. The accuracy of CEUS in diagnosing of breast cancer has never been systematically assessed. To determine the overall performance of CEUS in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions using meta-analysis. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and article references published before October 2012 were searched. Published studies that used histopathologic results as golden reference to assess the diagnostic performance of CEUS in patients suspected of having breast cancer and the data necessary to calculate the diagnostic results were included. The qualities of eligible studies for final meta-analysis were assessed by using the quality assessment of diagnostic studies (QUADAS) instrument. Sensitivity, specificity, summary receiver-operating characteristic (sROC) curves, and area under the curve were calculated to examine the diagnostic performance of CEUS. Of 16 eligible studies, 957 breast lesions were included in the original meta-analysis, among which heterogeneity arising from factors other than threshold effect was explored. Meta-regression analysis confirmed the contrast agent was the most significant factor cause of heterogeneity (P = 0.0012, relative diagnostic odds ratio [DOR] = 7.06). The use of perfluoro containing microbubbles (Sonovue or Optison) significantly increased the diagnostic precision compared with Levovist. The pooled weighted estimates of sensitivity and specificity for CEUS in the diagnosis of breast lesions were 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83, 0.89) and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.75, 0.83), respectively. CEUS has good sensitivity and specificity in the characterization of breast lesions and can potentially help to select suspicious breast mass for surgery.This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Imaging in assessing hepatic and peritoneal metastases of gastric cancer: a systematic reviewBMC Gastroenterology, 2011
- Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breastsEuropean Radiology, 2009
- New potential and applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the breast: Own investigations and review of the literatureEuropean Journal of Radiology, 2009
- Evaluation of breast lesions with contrast-enhanced ultrasound using the microvascular imaging technique: Initial observationsThe Breast, 2008
- Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: Evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives, and associated costEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2008
- Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: Efficacy of Real Time Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound vs. Magnetic Resonance ImagingUltraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound, 2007
- The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessedJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2005
- Computer-assisted quantitative assessment of power Doppler US: effects of microbubble contrast agent in the differentiation of breast tumorsEuropean Journal of Radiology, 2005
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Value of contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography using a microbubble echo-enhancing agent in evaluation of small breast lesionsJournal of Clinical Ultrasound, 2003