The Life Cycles of Modern Artists
- 1 July 2004
- journal article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
- Vol. 37 (3)
- https://doi.org/10.3200/hmts.37.3.123-136
Abstract
In earlier research, the author has contrasted the methods and life cycles of conceptual innovators, who express specific ideas and produce their major discoveries early in their careers, with those of experimental artists, who present visual perceptions and arrive at their major contributions late in life. This article extends the analysis: it shows that the binary division between the two types of artists is a qualitative approximation to an underlying continuous spectrum of approaches, and it considers whether artists can change their approach, and therefore their position on that spectrum, over time. The article also illustrates the value of the analysis, by showing why some of the greatest modern artists have not made important individual works and by considering why their experimental approach led the Impressionists to challenge the official Salon in the late nineteenth century.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Life Cycles of Modern Artists: Theory, Measurement, and ImplicationsPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,2003
- Painting outside the LinesPublished by JSTOR ,2002
- Measuring Masters and MasterpiecesHistoire & mesure, 2002
- Was Jackson Pollock the Greatest Modern American Painter?: A Quantitative InvestigationHistorical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, 2002
- Quantifying Artistic Success: Ranking French Painters—and Paintings—from Impressionism to CubismHistorical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, 2002
- Pop ArtPublished by University of California Press ,1998
- What the Papers Say: Politics and Ideology in Picasso's Collages of 1912Art Journal, 1988