Videolaryngoscopy
- 31 August 2010
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Current Anaesthesia & Critical Care
- Vol. 21 (4), 199-205
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cacc.2010.03.006
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of Three Videolaryngoscopes: The Macintosh Laryngoscope Blade Reduces, but Does Not Replace, Routine Stylet Use for Intubation in Morbidly Obese PatientsAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2009
- A Macintosh Laryngoscope Blade for Videolaryngoscopy Reduces Stylet Use in Patients with Normal AirwaysAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2009
- Randomized controlled trial of intubation with the McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope by inexperienced anaesthetistsBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2009
- Cervical Spine MotionAnesthesiology, 2009
- Expected difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective comparison of direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy in 200 patientsBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2009
- Review of video laryngoscopy and rigid fiberoptic laryngoscopyCurrent Opinion In Anesthesiology, 2008
- Pentax-AWS, a new videolaryngoscope, is more effective than the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with restricted neck movements: a randomized comparative studyBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2008
- The Airtraq® as a rescue airway device following failed direct laryngoscopy: a case seriesAnaesthesia, 2007
- A comparison of tracheal intubation using the Airtraq® or the Macintosh laryngoscope in routine airway management: a randomised, controlled clinical trialAnaesthesia, 2006
- Comparison of direct and video-assisted views of the larynx during routine intubationJournal of Clinical Anesthesia, 2006