Uncertainty method improved on best–worst case analysis in a binary meta-analysis
- 30 June 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 58 (6), 579-588
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.09.013
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intention-to-treat approach to data from randomized controlled trials: a sensitivity analysisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2003
- Artemether-lumefantrine for treating uncomplicated falciparum malariaEmergencias, 2003
- A graphical sensitivity analysis for clinical trials with non‐ignorable missing binary outcomeStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Group comparisons involving missing data in clinical trials: a comparison of estimates and power (size) for some simple approachesStatistics in Medicine, 2001
- Sensitivity Analysis for Incomplete Contingency Tables: The Slovenian Plebiscite CaseJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 2001
- Sensitivity Analysis by Worst and Best Case Assessment: Is it Really Sensitive?Drug Information Journal, 1999
- Publication bias in meta-analysis: a Bayesian data-augmentation approach to account for issues exemplified in the passive smoking debateStatistical Science, 1997
- Modeling the Drop-Out Mechanism in Repeated-Measures StudiesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1995
- Modeling the Drop-Out Mechanism in Repeated-Measures StudiesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1995
- ON ESTIMATING THE RELATION BETWEEN BLOOD GROUP AND DISEASEAnnals of Human Genetics, 1955