Reconsidering Forced-Choice Item Formats for Applicant Personality Assessment
- 1 May 2005
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Human Performance
- Vol. 18 (3), 267-307
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1803_4
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- Substance versus style: A new look at social desirability in motivating contexts.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002
- The Effects of Social Desirability and Faking on Personality and Integrity Assessment for Personnel SelectionHuman Performance, 1998
- Effects of Intentional Distortion in Personality Measurement and evaluation of Suggested PalliativesHuman Performance, 1998
- Five-Factor Model of personality and Performance in Jobs Involving Interpersonal InteractionsHuman Performance, 1998
- Validity of Customer Service Measures in Personnel Selection: A Review of Criterion and Construct EvidenceHuman Performance, 1998
- THE VALIDITY OF NON-COGNITIVE MEASURES DECAYS WHEN APPLICANTS FAKE.Academy of Management Proceedings, 1996
- Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1996
- The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure.Psychological Assessment, 1992
- An evaluation of forced-choice and true-false item formats in personality assessmentJournal of Research in Personality, 1973
- Suppressor Variables, Prediction, and the interpretation of Psychological RelationshipsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1972