The impact of general versus specific expert testimony and eyewitness confidence upon mock juror judgment.
- 1 September 1986
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Law and Human Behavior
- Vol. 10 (3), 215-228
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01046211
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- The jury is still out: A reply to Deffenbacher.American Psychologist, 1984
- Process and outcome considerations in juror evaluation of eyewitness testimony.American Psychologist, 1984
- Do the eyes have it? More on expert eyewitness testimony.American Psychologist, 1984
- Eyewitness identification: What can a psychologist tell a jury?American Psychologist, 1983
- A time to speak, or a time to keep silence?American Psychologist, 1983
- Silence is not golden.American Psychologist, 1983
- Whose shadow is crooked? Comment.American Psychologist, 1983
- The tractability of eyewitness confidence and its implications for triers of fact.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1981
- Impact of expert psychological testimony on the unreliability of eyewitness identification.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980
- Influence of expert testimony regarding eyewitness accuracy on jury decisions.Law and Human Behavior, 1980