Unrestricted Coupled Cluster and Brueckner Doubles Variations of W1 Theory
- 31 August 2009
- journal article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Vol. 5 (10), 2687-2693
- https://doi.org/10.1021/ct900260g
Abstract
Unrestricted coupled cluster spin contamination corrected [UCCSD(T)] and unrestricted Brueckner doubles [UBD(T)] variations of the Weizmann-1 theory (W1), denoted as W1U, W1Usc, and W1BD, respectively, are compared with the restricted open-shell W1 theory [W1(RO)]. The performances of the four W1 variants are assessed with 220 total atomization energies, electron affinities, ionization potentials, and proton affinities in the G2/97 test set, for consistency with the error analysis of the original W1(RO) study. The root-mean-square deviations from the experiment of W1U (0.65 ± 0.48 kcal/mol), W1Usc (0.57 ± 0.48 kcal/mol), W1BD (0.62 ± 0.48 kcal/mol), and W1(RO) (0.57 ± 0.48 kcal/mol) show that the four methods are virtually indistinguishable. This error analysis excludes the “singlet biradicals,” C2 and O3, since single determinantal methods are not really adequate for these strongly multireference systems. The unrestricted W1 variants perform poorly for such highly spin-contaminated and multireference species (the largest deviation from experiment for W1Usc is −4.2 ± 0.1 kcal/mol for the O3 EA). W1(RO) performs much better than its unrestricted counterparts for these pathological cases (the deviation from experiment is reduced to −1.5 ± 0.1 kcal/mol for the O3 EA), though the errors are significantly larger than those for the overall test set. The examples of C2, O3, and the F2 potential energy curve indicate that an advantage to using W1BD is that the error in ⟨S2⟩ correlates with the magnitude of the error in energy, whereas W1(RO) loses accuracy without such a warning.Keywords
This publication has 62 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment of Gaussian-2 and density functional theories for the computation of ionization potentials and electron affinitiesThe Journal of Chemical Physics, 1998
- DIRAC–FOCK ATOMIC ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE CALCULATIONS USING DIFFERENT NUCLEAR CHARGE DISTRIBUTIONSAtomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, 1997
- Assessment of Gaussian-2 and density functional theories for the computation of enthalpies of formationThe Journal of Chemical Physics, 1997
- Thermochemistry of the benzyl and allyl radicals and ionsInternational Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Ion Processes, 1996
- Coupled-Cluster singles, doubles, and triples calculations with hartree-fock and brueckner orbital reference determinants: A comparative studyInternational Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 1994
- On the choice of orbitals for symmetry breaking problems with application to NO3The Journal of Chemical Physics, 1992
- A full coupled-cluster singles and doubles model: The inclusion of disconnected triplesThe Journal of Chemical Physics, 1982
- An electron pair operator approach to coupled cluster wave functions. Application to He2, Be2, and Mg2 and comparison with CEPA methodsThe Journal of Chemical Physics, 1981
- Analysis of theGround State of Lithium in Terms of Natural and Best Overlap (Brueckner) Spin Orbitals with Implications for the Fermi Contact TermPhysical Review B, 1969
- New Developments in Molecular Orbital TheoryReviews of Modern Physics, 1951