Sexual Selection for Male Mobility in a Giant Insect with Female‐Biased Size Dimorphism
- 1 September 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by University of Chicago Press in The American Naturalist
- Vol. 172 (3), 417-423
- https://doi.org/10.1086/589894
Abstract
Female-biased size dimorphism, in which females are larger than males, is prevalent in many animals. Several hypotheses have been developed to explain this pattern of dimorphism. One of these hypotheses, the mobility hypothesis, suggests that female-biased size dimorphism arises because smaller males are favored in scramble competition for mates. Using radiotelemetry, we assessed the mobility hypothesis in the Cook Strait giant weta (Deinacrida rugosa), a species with strong female-biased size dimorphism, and tested the prediction that male traits promoting mobility (i.e., longer legs, smaller bodies) are useful in scramble competition for mates and thus promote reproductive success. Our predictions were supported: males with longer legs and smaller bodies exhibited greater mobility ( daily linear displacement when not mating), and more mobile males had greater insemination success. No phenotypic traits predicted female mobility or insemination success. In species with female-biased size dimorphism, sexual selection on males is often considered to be weak compared to species in which males are large or possess weaponry. We found that male giant weta experience sexual selection intensities on par with males of a closely related harem-defending polygynous species, likely because of strong scramble competition with other males.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long‐term paternity skew and the opportunity for selection in a mammal with reversed sexual size dimorphismMolecular Ecology, 2006
- Parasites as a Viability Cost of Sexual Selection in Natural Populations of MammalsScience, 2002
- Mating success in the spittlebug Cercopis sanguinolenta (Scopoli, 1763) (Homoptera, Cercopidae): the role of body size and mobilityJournal of Ethology, 2002
- SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM IN SHOREBIRDS, GULLS, AND ALCIDS: THE INFLUENCE OF SEXUAL AND NATURAL SELECTIONEvolution, 2000
- Allometry for Sexual Size Dimorphism: Pattern and Process in the Coevolution of Body Size in Males and FemalesAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1997
- Understanding natural selection: an approach integrating selection gradients, multiplicative fitness components, and path analysisEthology Ecology & Evolution, 1996
- Sexual selectionTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 1996
- Intraspecific Variation in Body Size and Fecundity in Insects: A General RelationshipOikos, 1993
- The Evolution of Large Body Size in Females: A Critique of Darwin's "Fecundity Advantage" ModelThe American Naturalist, 1988
- A comparative study of the biology of the Giant wetas Deinacrida heteracantha and D. fallai (Orthoptera : Henicidae) from New ZealandJournal of Zoology, 1973