The Flat-Rate Pricing Paradox: Conflicting Effects of “All-You-Can-Eat” Buffet Pricing
- 1 February 2011
- journal article
- Published by MIT Press in The Review of Economics and Statistics
- Vol. 93 (1), 193-200
- https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00057
Abstract
Are price and consumption independent in flat-rate price service contexts? A field experiment at an all-you-can-eat pizza restaurant shows that a 50%% discount on the price of the meal led customers to consume 27.9%% less pizza (2.95 versus 4.09 pieces). A second analysis indicated that individual taste ratings of this pizza tended to be inversely related to how much is consumed. One possible interpretation of these two findings is that individuals in a flat-rate (or fixed-price) context may consume the amount that enables them to get their money's worth rather than consuming until their marginal utility of consumption is 0. © 2011 The President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Paying Too Much and Being Happy about It: Existence, Causes, and Consequences of Tariff-Choice BiasesJournal of Marketing Research, 2006
- Paying Not to Go to the GymAmerican Economic Review, 2006
- Market mavens: Psychological influencesPsychology & Marketing, 2005
- Contract Design and Self-Control: Theory and EvidenceThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2004
- Implementing Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects in StataThe Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata, 2004
- Are Sale Signs Less Effective When More Products Have Them?Marketing Science, 2001
- Annual Deaths Attributable to Obesity in the United StatesJAMA, 1999
- The Role of Sale SignsMarketing Science, 1998
- Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced UtilityThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997
- The psychology of sunk costOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1985