Forensic scientists’ conclusions: How readable are they for non-scientist report-users?
- 1 September 2013
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Forensic Science International
- Vol. 231 (1-3), 102-112
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.04.026
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of Forensic Evidence on Criminal Justice Case ProcessingJournal of Forensic Sciences, 2012
- Lawyers and DNA: Issues in Understanding and Challenging the EvidenceCurrent Issues in Criminal Justice, 2012
- Understanding of forensic expert reports by judges, defense lawyers and forensic professionalsPsychology, Crime & Law, 2012
- If the Shoe Fits They Might Acquit: The Value of Forensic Science TestimonyJournal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2011
- Understanding Juror Perceptions of Forensic Evidence: Investigating the Impact of Case Context on Perceptions of Forensic Evidence StrengthJournal of Forensic Sciences, 2011
- Assessing Readability of Patient Education Materials: Current Role in OrthopaedicsClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2010
- Factors influencing police performance in the investigation of volume crimes in England and WalesPolice Practice and Research, 2009
- Quality and integrity in scientific writing: prerequisites for quality in science communicationJournal of Science Communication, 2009
- The testimony of forensic identification science: What expert witnesses say and what factfinders hear.Law and Human Behavior, 2009
- Forensic drug Intelligence: An important tool in law enforcementForensic Science International, 2007