On the Causes of Evolutionary Transition:Transversion Bias
Open Access
- 25 November 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Vol. 33 (3), 595-602
- https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msv274
Abstract
A pattern in which nucleotide transitions are favored several fold over transversions is common in molecular evolution. When this pattern occurs among amino acid replacements, explanations often invoke an effect of selection, on the grounds that transitions are more conservative in their effects on proteins. However, the underlying hypothesis of conservative transitions has never been tested directly. Here we assess support for this hypothesis using direct evidence: the fitness effects of mutations in actual proteins measured via individual or paired growth experiments. We assembled data from 8 published studies, ranging in size from 24 to 757 single-nucleotide mutations that change an amino acid. Every study has the statistical power to reveal significant effects of amino acid exchangeability, and most studies have the power to discern a binary conservative-vs-radical distinction. However, only one study suggests that transitions are significantly more conservative than transversions. In the combined set of 1,239 replacements (544 transitions, 695 transversions), the chance that a transition is more conservative than a transversion is 53 % (95 % confidence interval 50 to 56) compared with the null expectation of 50 %. We show that this effect is not large compared with that of most biochemical factors, and is not large enough to explain the several-fold bias observed in evolution. In short, the available data have the power to verify the “conservative transitions” hypothesis if true, but suggest instead that selection on proteins plays at best a minor role in the observed bias.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Extreme Genetic Fragility of the HIV-1 CapsidPLoS Pathogens, 2013
- Quantifying the Adaptive Potential of an Antibiotic Resistance EnzymePLoS Genetics, 2012
- Mutational Effects and Population Dynamics During Viral Adaptation Challenge Current ModelsGenetics, 2011
- Diminishing Returns From Beneficial Mutations and Pervasive Epistasis Shape the Fitness Landscape for Rifampicin Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosaGenetics, 2010
- Distribution of Fitness Effects Caused by Single-Nucleotide Substitutions in Bacteriophage f1Genetics, 2010
- Rate, molecular spectrum, and consequences of human mutationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010
- The Fitness Effects of Random Mutations in Single-Stranded DNA and RNA BacteriophagesPLoS Genetics, 2009
- The distribution of fitness effects of new mutationsNature Reviews Genetics, 2007
- High Frequency of Mutations That Expand the Host Range of an RNA VirusGenetics, 2007
- Transition-Transversion Bias Is Not Universal: A Counter Example from Grasshopper PseudogenesPLoS Genetics, 2007