Significant difference between three observers in the assessment of intraepidermal nerve fiber density in skin biopsy
Open Access
- 31 March 2009
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Neurology
- Vol. 9 (1), 1-8
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-9-13
Abstract
Background: The determination of Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber Density (IENFD) in skin biopsy is a useful method for the evaluation of different types of peripheral neuropathies. To allow a reliable use of the method it is necessary to determine interobserver reliability. Previous studies dealing with this topic used limited suitable statistical methods. Methods: In the present study three observers determined the IENFD and estimated the staining quality of the basement membrane for an adequate quantity of 120 skin biopsies (stained with indirect immunofluorescence technique) from 68 patients. More adequate statistical methods like intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland Altman Plot were chosen to estimate interobserver reliability. Results: We found an unexpected significant difference in IENFD between the observers (p < 0.05) and so the results of this study are not in line with the high interobserver reliability reported before (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.73). The Bland Altmann Plot showed a variance growing with rising mean. The difference in IENFD between the observers and the resulting low interobserver reliability is likely caused by different interpretations of the standard counting rules. There was no significant difference in IENFD between observers for biopsies with a well-defined basement membrane. Thus skin biopsies with an inexactly defined basement membrane should not be used diagnostically for the determination of IENFD. Conclusion: These results emphasise that standardisation of the method is extremely important and at least two observers should analyse skin biopsies with critical IENFD near the cut-off values.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Painful or painless lower limb dysesthesias are highly predictive of peripheral neuropathy: Comparison of different diagnostic modalitiesEuropean journal of pain, 2009
- Diagnostic validity of epidermal nerve fiber densities in painful sensory neuropathiesMuscle & Nerve, 2007
- Small-Fiber Neuropathy: Answering the Burning QuestionsScience of Aging Knowledge Environment, 2006
- Intraepidermal nerve fibre density, quantitative sensory testing and nerve conduction studies in a patient material with symptoms and signs of sensory polyneuropathyEuropean Journal of Neurology, 2006
- The utility of skin biopsy for prediction of progression in suspected small fiber neuropathyNeurology, 2006
- EFNS guidelines on the use of skin biopsy in the diagnosis of peripheral neuropathyEuropean Journal of Neurology, 2005
- The reliability of skin biopsy with measurement of intraepidermal nerve fiber densityJournal of the Neurological Sciences, 2005
- Small‐fiber sensory neuropathies: Clinical course and neuropathology of idiopathic casesAnnals of Neurology, 1998
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.Psychological Bulletin, 1979