Is innovative also effective? A critique of pro-poor shelter in South-East Asia
- 1 December 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in International Journal of Housing Policy
- Vol. 18 (2), 233-265
- https://doi.org/10.1080/14616718.2016.1248606
Abstract
As developing Asia transforms under neoliberalism and decentralisation, urban inequality and housing deprivation are deepening. Are contemporary shelter innovations for the poor in developing Asia effective? How? Why? These questions lead this paper to qualitatively critique and compare four innovative shelter programmes from Thailand, Indonesia and the Philippines. Here, innovative implies an enlargement of the roles of local governments and/or other stakeholders in shelter delivery. The analysis illuminates how the historical evolution of institutions affects a programme's institutional arrangements; which, with other contextual idiosyncrasies, impact objectives and outcomes. The paper posits scalability, habitability, affordability, accessibility and inclusivity as dimensions of effectiveness. It finds that under neoliberal influences shelter policy's pro-poor focus is shrinking. Albeit context-specific, the outcomes reveal key influential commonalities: (1) multi-stakeholder arrangements with non-state partners are more effective; (2) greater civil society and community participation yield more equity; (3) strong leadership by some institutional partner is imperative; (4) private sector involvement can significantly boost scaling-up. The findings offer lessons for improving pro-poor shelter policies and suggest future research needs and pathways.Keywords
Funding Information
- Ford Foundation (1090-1051)
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Model of Community-based Housing Development (CBHD) of Bedah Kampung Program in Surakarta IndonesiaProcedia Environmental Sciences, 2014
- Urban development in a decentralized Indonesia: Two Success Stories?Pacific Affairs, 2013
- Baan Mankong participatory slum upgrading in Bangkok, Thailand: Community perceptions of outcomes and security of tenureHabitat International, 2012
- Pro-poor housing policies: Rethinking the potential of assisted self-help housingHabitat International, 2010
- Land for housing the poor — by the poor: experiences from the Baan Mankong nationwide slum upgrading programme in ThailandEnvironment and Urbanization, 2009
- Planning and DecentralizationPublished by Taylor & Francis Ltd ,2008
- Housing Policy in Developing Countries: Conjectures and RefutationsThe World Bank Research Observer, 2005
- Left to their own devices? Community self-help between alternative development and neo-liberalismCommunity Development Journal, 2005
- Deep democracy: urban governmentality and the horizon of politicsEnvironment and Urbanization, 2001
- Poverty Alleviation and the Eviction of the Poorest: Towards Urban Land Reform in the Philippines∗International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2000