Comparison of fluoroscopy-guided Pull-type Percutaneous Radiological Gastrostomy (Pull-type-PRG) with conventional Percutaneous Radiological Gastrostomy (Push-type-PRG): clinical results in 253 patients
- 9 July 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in European Radiology
- Vol. 21 (11), 2354-2361
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2194-3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Large or Small Bore, Push or Pull: A Comparison of Three Classes of Percutaneous Fluoroscopic Gastrostomy CathetersJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2008
- CT-gesteuerte perkutane Gastrostomie: Technischer Erfolg, Früh- und SpätkomplikationenRöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren, 2007
- Radiologic gastrostomyEndoscopy, 2007
- Incidence of abdominal wall metastasis complicating PEG tube placement in untreated head and neck cancerGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005
- Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: A comparison of indications, complications and outcomes in 370 patientsEuropean Journal of Radiology, 2005
- Percutaneous radiological gastrostomy in patients with head and neck cancerEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2001
- DiscussionNutrition, 1998
- Percutaneous gastrostomy in radiologic practiceAustralasian Radiology, 1997
- Radiologisch assistierte perkutane Gastro-/Enterostomie - Retrospektive Analyse von 90 EingriffenRöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren, 1996
- Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG): Comparison of Push and Pull Methods and Evaluation of Antibiotic ProphylaxisEndoscopy, 1995