Cesarean Section Rate Analysis in University Hospital Tuzla - According to Robson’s Classification
Open Access
- 1 January 2016
- journal article
- Published by ScopeMed in Medical Archives
- Vol. 70 (3), 213-216
- https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2016.70.213-216
Abstract
For last decades, there has public concern about increasing Cesarean Section (CS) rates, and it is an issue of international public health concern. According to World Health Organisation (WHO) there is no justification to have more than 10-15% CS births. WHO proposes the Robson ten-group classification, as a global standard for assessing, monitoring and comparing cesarean section rates. The aim of this study was to investigate Cesarean section rate at University Hospital Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Cross sectional study was conducted for one-year period, 2015. Statistical analysis and graph-table presentation was performed using Excel 2010 and Microsoft Office programs. Out of 3,672 births, a total of 936 births were performed by CS. Percentage of the total number of CS to the total birth number was 25,47%. According to Robson classification, the largest was group 5 with relative contribution of 29,80%. On second and third place were group 1 and 2 with relative contribution of 26,06% and 15,78% respectively. Groups 1, 2, 5 made account of realtive contribution of 71,65%. All other groups had entirely relative contribution of 28,35%. Robson 10-group classification provides easy way in collecting information about CS rate. It is important that efforts to reduce the overall CS rate should focus on reducing the primary CS. Data from our study confirm this attitude.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analysis of Cesarean Section Rate - According to Robson’s 10-group ClassificationOman Medical Journal, 2012
- Cesarean section rate in Iran, multidimensional approaches for behavioral change of providers: a qualitative studyBMC Health Services Research, 2011
- Epidemiology and trends for Caesarean section births in New South Wales, Australia: A population-based studyBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2011
- The change in the rate of vaginal birth after caesarean sectionPaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 2010
- Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous laborAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2009
- Cesarean Birth in the United States: Epidemiology, Trends, and OutcomesClinics in Perinatology, 2008
- Evidence‐Based Strategies for Reducing Cesarean Section Rates: A Meta‐AnalysisBirth, 2007
- Elective Cesarean Section and Decision Making: A Critical Review of the LiteratureBirth, 2007
- Are There “Unnecessary” Cesarean Sections? Perceptions of Women and Obstetricians About Cesarean Sections for Nonclinical IndicationsBirth, 2007
- Can we reduce the caesarean section rate?Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2001