Decision Analysis Frameworks for Life‐Cycle Impact Assessment
- 1 October 2001
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Industrial Ecology
- Vol. 5 (4), 45-68
- https://doi.org/10.1162/10881980160084033
Abstract
Life-cycle impact assessments (LCIAs) are complex because they almost always involve uncertain consequences relative to multiple criteria. Several authors have noticed that this is precisely the sort of problem addressed by methods of decision analysis. Despite several experiences of using multiple-attribute decision analysis (MADA) methods in LCIA, the possibilities of MADA methods in LCIA are rather poorly elaborated in the field of life-cycle assessment. In this article we provide an overview of the commonly used MADA methods and discuss LCIA in relation to them. The article also presents how different frames and tools developed by the MADA community can be applied in conducting LCIAs. Although the exact framing of LCIA using decision analysis still merits debate, we show that the similarities between generic decision analysis steps and their LCIA counterparts are clear. Structuring of an assessment problem according to a value tree offers a basis for the definition of impact categories and classification. Value trees can thus be used to ensure that all relevant impact categories and interventions are taken into account in the appropriate manner. The similarities between multiattribute value theory (MAVT) and the current calculation rule applied in LCIA mean that techniques, knowledge, and experiences derived from MAVT can be applied to LCIA. For example, MAVT offers a general solution for the calculation of overall impact values and it can be applied to help discern sound from unsound approaches to value measurement, normalization, weighting, and aggregation in the LCIA model. In addition, the MAVT framework can assist in the methodological development of LCIA because of its well-established theoretical foundation. The relationship between MAVT and the current LCIA methodology does not preclude application of other MADA methods in the context of LCIA. A need exists to analyze the weaknesses and the strengths of different multiple-criteria decision analysis methods in order to identify those methods most appropriate for different LCIA applicationsKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Framework for modelling data uncertainty in life cycle inventoriesThe International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2001
- A decision-analytic framework for impact assessment part I: LCA and decision analysisThe International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2001
- Midpoints versus endpoints: The sacrifices and benefitsThe International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2000
- Process synthesis and optimisation tools for environmental design: methodology and structureComputers & Chemical Engineering, 2000
- Linear programming as a tool in life cycle assessmentThe International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1998
- Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA methodEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 1998
- Decision analysis in energy and environmental modelingEnergy, 1995
- Life cycle assessment: A comparison of three methods for impact analysis and evaluationJournal of Cleaner Production, 1994
- Comparison of Weighting Judgments in Multiattribute Utility MeasurementManagement Science, 1991
- Qualitative multiple criteria choice analysisQuality & Quantity, 1990