Confounding by Indication in Clinical Research
Top Cited Papers
- 1 November 2016
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 316 (17), 1818-1819
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.16435
Abstract
In the assessment of the effect of a treatment or potential risk factor—termed an exposure—on a patient outcome, the possibility of confounding by other factors must be considered.1 For example, if researchers studied the effect of coffee drinking on the development of lung cancer, they might observe an apparent association between these 2 variables. However, because drinking coffee is also related to smoking, the observed association between coffee drinking and lung cancer does not represent a true causal relationship but is rather the result of the association of coffee drinking with smoking—the confounder—which is the true cause of lung cancer.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Impact of Residual and Unmeasured Confounding in Epidemiologic Studies: A Simulation StudyAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2007
- Confounding in Health ResearchAnnual Review of Public Health, 2001
- Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health careBMJ, 1996