Second-Order Peer Review of the Medical Literature for Clinical Practitioners
Open Access
- 19 April 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Jama-Journal Of The American Medical Association
- Vol. 295 (15), 1801-1808
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.15.1801
Abstract
Clinical journals support several lines of research communication, including scientist-to-scientist (preliminary studies, the predominant mode), scientist-to-clinician (more definitive, ready-for-application original studies), clinician-to-clinician (review articles), and clinician-to-scientist communication (case reports and case series).1 These communication lines are not clearly differentiated in journals, and content that is ready for direct clinical application by clinicians of a particular clinical discipline is of low frequency, perhaps contributing to the difficulty that clinicians have in keeping up to date.2This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Systematic Review: The Relationship between Clinical Experience and Quality of Health CareAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2005
- What do evidence-based secondary journals tell us about the publication of clinically important articles in primary healthcare journals?BMC Medicine, 2004
- Obstacles to answering doctors' questions about patient care with evidence: qualitative studyBMJ, 2002
- Access to the evidence base from general practice: a survey of general practice staff in Northern and Yorkshire RegionQuality in health care : QHC, 2001
- Evidence‐based medicine in general practice: beliefs and barriers among Australian GPsJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2001
- Information Economics and the InternetJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2000
- Evidence-based medicine and the practicing clinicianJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1999