Pedicle Screws With High Electrical Resistance
- 1 July 2002
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Spine
- Vol. 27 (14), 1577-1581
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200207150-00018
Abstract
Clinically relevant aspects of pedicle screws were subjected to electrical resistance testing. To catalog commonly used pedicle screws in terms of electrical resistance, and to determine whether polyaxial-type pedicle screws have the potential to create a high-resistance circuit during stimulus-evoked electromyographic testing. Although stimulus-evoked electromyography is commonly used to confirm the accuracy of pedicle screw placement, no studies have documented the electrical resistance of commonly used pedicle screws. Resistance measurements were obtained from eight pedicle screw varieties (5 screws of each type) across the screw shank and between the shank and regions of the screw that would be clinically accessible to stimulus-evoked electromyographic testing with a screw implanted in a pedicle. To determine measurement variability, resistance was measured three times at each site and with the crown of the polyaxial-type screw in three random positions. Resistance across the screw shank ranged from 0 to 36.4 ohms, whereas resistance across the length of the monoaxial-type screws ranged from 0.1 to 31.8 ohms. Resistance between the hexagonal port and shank of polyaxial-type screws ranged from 0 to 25 ohms. In contrast, resistance between the mobile crown and shank of polyaxial-type screws varied widely, ranging from 0.1 ohms to an open circuit (no electrical conduction). Polyaxial-type screws demonstrated an open circuit in 28 of 75 measurements (37%) and a high-resistance circuit (exceeding 1000 ohms) in 5 of 75 measurements (7%). Polyaxial-type pedicle screws have the potential for high electrical resistance between the mobile crown and shank, and therefore may fail to demonstrate an electromyographic response during stimulus-evoked electromyographic testing in the setting of a pedicle breech. To avoid false-negative stimulus-evoked electromyographic testing, the cathode stimulator probe should be applied to the hexagonal port or directly to the screw shank, and not to the mobile crown.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Safety and Efficacy of Pedicle Screw Placement for Adult Spinal Deformity with a Pedicle-Probing Conventional Anatomic TechniquePublished by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ,2000
- A Comparison of Impedance and Electromyogram Measurements in Detecting the Presence of Pedicle Wall BreakthroughSpine, 1998
- Higher Electrical Stimulus Intensities Are Required to Activate Chronically Compressed Nerve RootsSpine, 1998
- Anatomic Relations Between the Lumbar Pedicle and the Adjacent Neural StructuresSpine, 1997
- Evoked and Spontaneous Electromyography to Evaluate Lumbosacral Pedicle Screw PlacementSpine, 1996
- Evaluation of Intrapedicular Screw Position Using Intraoperative Evoked ElectromyographySpine, 1995
- Stimulus-Evoked EMG Monitoring During Transpedicular Lumbosacral Spine InstrumentationSpine, 1994
- Intraoperative Evoked EMG Monitoring in an Animal ModelSpine, 1992
- Problems and Solutions of Pedicle Screw Plate Fixation of Lumbar SpineSpine, 1990
- The specific resistance of biological material—A compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologistMedical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 1967